Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705100›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2022

Investigating time-based expectancy beyond binary timing scenarios: evidence from a paradigm employing three predictive pre-target intervals.

Stefanie Aufschnaiter, Fang Zhao, Robert Gaschler, Andrea Kiesel, Roland Thomaschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie AufschnaiterCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany. stefanie.aufschnaiter@psychologie.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-7360
Fang ZhaoResearch Cluster D2L2, University of Hagen, Universitaetsstrasse 27, 58097, Hagen, Germany.
Robert GaschlerDepartment of Psychology, University of Hagen, Universitaetsstrasse 33, 58084, Hagen, Germany.
Andrea KieselCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.
Roland ThomaschkeCognition, Action and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg, Engelbergerstrasse 41, 79085, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GA 2246/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TH 1554/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When the duration of a pre-target interval probabilistically predicts the identity of the target, participants typically form time-based expectancies: they respond faster to frequent interval-target combinations than to infrequent ones. Yet, previous research investigating the cognitive time-processing mechanisms underlying time-based expectancy assessed time-based expectancy always in situations with a binary set of intervals (i.e. short vs. long). Here we aim to test whether time-based expectancy transfers to more complex settings with three different predictive time intervals (short, medium, long) in which each predicts one of three different target stimuli with 80% probability. In three experiments we varied how the medium interval was computed (arithmetic mean, geometric mean, or in between both). Our results showed that participants were able to learn the time-event contingencies for the short and the long as well as for the medium interval, and were, thus able to flexibly redirect their target expectancy two times during the course of a trial. The evidence concerning the impact of the manipulation of the medium intervals' absolute duration on time-based expectancy was, however, mixed, as time-based expectancy for the medium interval could only be observed in one of three reported experiments. In sum, the findings of the present study suggest a previously unknown cognitive flexibility underlying time-based expectancy and offer important theoretical implications, challenging future research on the timing mechanisms involved in time-based expectancy.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID34705100
PMCPMC9363376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.