Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705072›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Multiple platelet-rich plasma injections are superior to single PRP injections or saline in osteoarthritis of the knee: the 2-year results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Alparslan Yurtbay, Ferhat Say, Hikmet Çinka, Ahmet Ersoy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04454164 (Platelet Rich Plasma In Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04454164 early_phase1completednot on this map

Platelet Rich Plasma In Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFerhat SayRan2018 to 2020Enrolled324ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Cartilage DegenerationArmsPRP, Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alparslan YurtbayDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, İlkadım, 55139, Samsun, Turkey. yurtbayalparslan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8156-3504
Ferhat SayDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-0942
Hikmet ÇinkaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9423-1728
Ahmet ErsoyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3427-8337
Ondokuz Mayıs University · TRSamsun University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe primary purposes of this study were to prove the efficacy of PRP injection therapy on knee pain and functions by comparing patients with mild to moderate OA with a placebo control group, and also to understand the effectiveness of multiple doses compared to a single dose. It was hypothesized that PRP would lead to more favorable results than the placebo at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. MATERIALS AND

methods237 patients diagnosed with OA were randomly separated into 4 groups, who were administered the following: single dose of PRP (n: 62), single dose of sodium saline (NS) (n: 59), three doses of PRP (n: 63), and three doses of NS (n: 53). Clinical evaluations were made pre-treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post-treatment, using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Result Score (KOOS), Kujala Patellofemoral Score, knee joint range of motion (ROM), measurements of knee circumference (KC), and mechanical axis angle (MAA) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain.

resultsThe better score values in the groups were recorded at 3 and 6 months. Patients treated with PRP maintained better scores at 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the NS groups (p < 0.05). Multiple doses of PRP were seen to be more effective than single-dose PRP at 6 and 12 months (p < 0.05). At the end of 24 months, there was no significant score difference across all the groups. The most positive change in scores was found in stage 2 OA, and the most positive change in ROM was in stage 3 OA patients. In the PRP groups, KC decreased more at 1 and 6 months (p < 0.05). Compared to other age groups, patients aged 51-65 years scored better at 6 months (p < 0.05). A negative correlation was determined with MAA scores (r = - 0.508, p < 0.001).

conclusionIn comparison to the placebo (NS), leukocyte-rich PRP treatment was determined to be effective in the treatment of OA. Multiple doses of PRP increase the treatment efficacy and duration. Of all the patients treated with PRP, the best results were obtained by patients aged 51-65 years, with lower MAA, and by K/L stage 2 OA patients. STUDY

designRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. REGISTRATION: NCT04454164 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePlatelet-Rich PlasmaHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularPainTreatment OutcomeHyaluronic AcidInjectionsIntra-articularKneeOsteoarthritisPlatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID34705072
OpenAlexW3209092379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.