ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2021
Luminance Thresholds and Their Correlation With Retinal Structure in X-Linked Retinoschisis.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term functional and structural outcomes in X-linked retinoschisis: implications for clinical trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Spatial and Temporal Integration Abnormalities in X-Linked Retinoschisis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022Article
- Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a comprehensive analysis of light- and dark-adapted luminance thresholds and their associations with retinal structure in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS). Methods: Nine subjects with XLRS and 10 visually-normal individuals participated. Threshold was measured at 15 locations along the horizontal meridian of the visual field at several adaptation levels (5 × 10-5 to 50 cd/m2) after dark-adaptation. The relationship between threshold and adaptation level across the field was described using a standard "threshold-versus-illuminance" model. Optical coherence tomography images were obtained and segmented to quantify outer nuclear layer (ONL+) and outer segment (OS+) thickness. A linear structure-function model was used to describe the relationship between threshold and the product of ONL+ and OS+ thickness. Results: For peripheral field measurements, thresholds were generally normal for most subjects with XLRS. All subjects had perifoveal and parafoveal threshold elevations under dark-adapted and high illuminance conditions, with thresholds at moderate illuminances being closer to normal. For foveal measurements, seven of nine subjects with XLRS had normal dark-adapted thresholds, and all had abnormally elevated high illuminance thresholds. Threshold-versus-illuminance curves in the fovea, parafovea, and perifovea were abnormally steep for subjects with XLRS, appearing similar to the normal peripheral field shape. Under both dark- and light-adapted conditions, threshold was predicted by ONL+ × OS+ thickness at nearly all field locations. Conclusions: Threshold elevation in XLRS is complex, depending on both the adaptation level and the visual field location. The pattern of threshold-versus-illuminance suggests that macular function in XLRS is similar to the periphery of controls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.