ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2021
Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis, characterization, and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of methyl proline derivatives of phenylpropanoid.RSC advances · 2026Article
- CDK4/6 Inhibitors for Breast Cancer Therapy-A Review of Clinical Trials, Structural and Computational Approaches.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Large Library Docking for Polypharmacology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Investigating the molecular mechanisms of the "Tianma-Gouteng" herb pair in treating Parkinson's disease: a bioinformatics approach and density functional theory with molecular dynamics simulations validation.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- The Six Ds of Exponentials and drug discovery: A path toward reversing Eroom's law.Drug discovery today · 2025Review
- Molecular docking and dynamics in protein serine/threonine kinase drug discovery: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- PbsNRs: predict the potential binders and scaffolds for nuclear receptors.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction to Enable Biocatalytic Synthesis of Azaphilones.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Drug Repositioning via Graph Neural Networks: Identifying Novel JAK2 Inhibitors from FDA-Approved Drugs through Molecular Docking and Biological Validation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Relationship Between Molecular Symmetry and Physicochemical Properties Involving Boiling and Melting of Organic Compounds.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- Discovery of GABA Aminotransferase Inhibitors via Molecular Docking, Molecular Dynamic Simulation, and Biological Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Vismodegib Identified as a Novel COX-2 Inhibitor via Deep-Learning-Based Drug Repositioning and Molecular Docking Analysis.ACS omega · 2023Article
- pyCHARMM: Embedding CHARMM Functionality in a Python Framework.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- Discovery of new STAT3 inhibitors as anticancer agents using ligand-receptor contact fingerprints and docking-augmented machine learning.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Identification of Novel Arachidonic Acid 15-Lipoxygenase Inhibitors Based on the Bayesian Classifier Model and Computer-Aided High-Throughput Virtual Screening.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The binding of small-molecule ligands to protein or nucleic acid targets is important to numerous biological processes. Accurate prediction of the binding modes between a ligand and a macromolecule is of fundamental importance in structure-based structure-function exploration. When multiple ligands with different sizes are docked to a target receptor, it is reasonable to assume that the residues in the binding pocket may adopt alternative conformations upon interacting with the different ligands. In addition, it has been suggested that the entropic contribution to binding can be important. However, only a few attempts to include the side chain conformational entropy upon binding within the application of flexible receptor docking methodology exist. Here, we propose a new physics-based scoring function that includes both enthalpic and entropic contributions upon binding by considering the conformational variability of the flexible side chains within the ensemble of docked poses. We also describe a novel hybrid searching algorithm that combines both molecular dynamics (MD)-based simulated annealing and genetic algorithm crossovers to address the enhanced sampling of the increased search space. We demonstrate improved accuracy in flexible cross-docking experiments compared with rigid cross-docking. We test our developments by considering five protein targets, thrombin, dihydrofolate reductase(DHFR), T4 L99A, T4 L99A/M102Q, and PDE10A, which belong to different enzyme classes with different binding pocket environments, as a representative set of diverse ligands and receptors. Each target contains dozens of different ligands bound to the same binding pocket. We also demonstrate that this flexible docking algorithm may be applicable to RNA docking with a representative riboswitch example. Our findings show significant improvements in top ranking accuracy across this set, with the largest improvement relative to rigid, 23.64%, occurring for ligands binding to DHFR. We then evaluate the ability to identify lead compounds among a large chemical space for the proposed flexible receptor docking algorithm using a subset of the DUD-E containing receptor targets MCR, GCR, and ANDR. We demonstrate that our new algorithms show improved performance in modeling flexible binding site residues compared to DOCK. Finally, we select the T4 L99A and T4 L99A/M102Q decoy sets, containing dozens of binders and experimentally validated nonbinders, to test our approach in distinguishing binders from nonbinders. We illustrate that our new algorithms for searching and scoring have superior performance to rigid receptor CDOCKER as well as AutoDock Vina. Finally, we suggest that flexible CDOCKER is sufficiently fast to be utilized in high-throughput docking screens in the context of hierarchical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.