Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34704389›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2022

Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.

Munjal Patel, Francesco Bellanti, Naveen M Daryani, Nadia Noormohamed, David W Hilbert, Katherine Young, Pooja Kulkarni, William Copalu, Ferdous Gheyas, Matthew L Rizk

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02493764 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02493764 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCRan2015 to 2019Enrolled537ConditionsBacterial PneumoniaArmsImipenem, Relebactam, Cilastatin, Piperacillin, Tazobactam
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Microbiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Munjal PatelMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Francesco BellantiCertara Strategic Consulting, Sheffield, UK.
Naveen M DaryaniMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Nadia NoormohamedMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
David W HilbertMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Katherine YoungMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Pooja KulkarniCertara Strategic Consulting, Sheffield, UK.
William CopaluCertara Strategic Consulting, Sheffield, UK.
Ferdous GheyasMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Matthew L RizkMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USStrategic Solutions Consulting (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the phase III RESTORE-IMI 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02493764), the combination antibacterial agent imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) demonstrated noninferiority to piperacillin/tazobactam for the end points of all-cause mortality at day 28 and favorable clinical response at the early follow-up visit in adult participants with gram-negative hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Existing population pharmacokinetic models for imipenem (IPM) and REL were updated using data from patients with HABP/VABP from RESTORE-IMI 2. Creatinine clearance (CrCl), body weight, infection type, and ventilation status were significant covariates in the updated model. The following simulations were performed to calculate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint probability of target attainment among patients with HABP/VABP and varying degrees of renal function: augmented renal clearance (CrCl ≥150 ml/min), normal renal function (CrCl ≥90 to <150 ml/min), renal impairment (mild, CrCl ≥60 to <90 ml/min; moderate, CrCl ≥30 to <60 ml/min; or severe, CrCl ≥15 to <30 ml/min), and end-stage renal disease (CrCl <15 ml/min). At the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens across renal categories, greater than 90% of patients in all renal function groups were predicted to achieve joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets at a minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml, regardless of ventilation status. This modeling and simulation analysis supports use of the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens, adjusted based on renal function, in patients with HABP/VABP.

Indexed as

ImipenemPneumonia, BacterialAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCilastatinHospitalsHumansVentilators, MechanicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo CompoundsCilastatinImipenemrelebactam

Identifiers

PMID34704389
PMCPMC8841461
OpenAlexW3208815892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.