ArticleClinical and translational science2022
Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02493764 (A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (MK-7655A) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Subjects With Hospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for β-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Pooled it
- Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam dosing regimen justification using exposure-efficacy analyses in participants with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia in the RESTORE-IMI 2 phase 3 study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Trial
- Determining the Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam Plus Aztreonam Against ConstitutiveOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Cost-minimizing alternative dosage regimens of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam for patients with renal impairment: a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Population pharmacokinetics of imipenem and target attainment of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices in Chinese adults with febrile neutropenia and hematological malignancies.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Article
- Relebactam restores susceptibility of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales and enhances imipenem activity against chromosomal AmpC-producing species: analysis of global SMART 2018-2020.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam efficacy, safety and probability of target attainment in adults with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia among patients with baseline renal impairment, normal renal function, and augmented renal clearance.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2023Article
- Simulation to minimise patient self-inflicted lung injury: are we almost there?British journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Imipenem-Relebactam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2022Review
- Article
- Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic assessment of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia.Clinical and translational science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the phase III RESTORE-IMI 2 study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02493764), the combination antibacterial agent imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) demonstrated noninferiority to piperacillin/tazobactam for the end points of all-cause mortality at day 28 and favorable clinical response at the early follow-up visit in adult participants with gram-negative hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Existing population pharmacokinetic models for imipenem (IPM) and REL were updated using data from patients with HABP/VABP from RESTORE-IMI 2. Creatinine clearance (CrCl), body weight, infection type, and ventilation status were significant covariates in the updated model. The following simulations were performed to calculate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint probability of target attainment among patients with HABP/VABP and varying degrees of renal function: augmented renal clearance (CrCl ≥150 ml/min), normal renal function (CrCl ≥90 to <150 ml/min), renal impairment (mild, CrCl ≥60 to <90 ml/min; moderate, CrCl ≥30 to <60 ml/min; or severe, CrCl ≥15 to <30 ml/min), and end-stage renal disease (CrCl <15 ml/min). At the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens across renal categories, greater than 90% of patients in all renal function groups were predicted to achieve joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets at a minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint of ≤2 μg/ml, regardless of ventilation status. This modeling and simulation analysis supports use of the recommended IMI/REL dosing regimens, adjusted based on renal function, in patients with HABP/VABP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.