Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34704256›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Intensive care-treated COVID-19 patients' perception of their illness and remaining symptoms.

Ewa Wallin, Michael Hultström, Miklos Lipcsey, Robert Frithiof, Sten Rubertsson, Ing-Marie Larsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Surviving COVID-19: patients' experiences of care and path to recovery.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ewa WallinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2492-8666
Michael HultströmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4675-1099
Miklos LipcseyDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1976-4129
Robert FrithiofDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sten RubertssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ing-Marie LarssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse KAW 2020.0182Svenska Läkaresällskapet SLS-938101Vetenskapsrådet 2014-02569Vetenskapsrådet 2014-07606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe remaining symptoms in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treated in intensive care unit are limited described. Therefore, we assessed patient's perception of their COVID-19 disease, stay in intensive care, and remaining symptoms three to six months after intensive care.

methodsProspective cohort study was performed in one intensive care unit of a university hospital in Sweden during the first wave. A questionnaire with open-ended questions and closed-ended questions was used. Data were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative content analysis and descriptive statistics.

resultsOut of 123 patients treated for COVID-19, 64 answered the questionnaire 3-6 months after discharge from intensive care. Memories from illness and hospital stay revealed in three categories; awareness of the illness, losing anchor to reality and being cared for in a dynamic environment. Information was perceived as spare by 48% and they wanted the information to be more personal. The diary was perceived as personal and was received by 33% patients. The relationship with family was affected among 39% and 13% of the patients indicated that they had not resumed their daily life. A large amount, 84%, indicated that they had remaining symptoms from COVID-19. The dominated symptoms were impaired strength and energy both physically and mentally.

conclusionPatients reported a variety of physical and mental symptoms, and revealed memories from the ICU, and specific awareness of other patients' health. It illustrates the need for screening patients for remaining symptoms after COVID-19 disease and ICU care and may affect resuming patients' daily life.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareHumansPerceptionProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2critical careinformationlong COVID-19memoriesoutcomepatient reported measuresremaining symptoms

Identifiers

PMID34704256
PMCPMC8653095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.