Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2022
High-Cost Users of Prescription Drugs: National Health Insurance Data from South Korea.
Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does chronic disease coverage for outpatient care affect healthcare utilization and expenditures in China? Evidence from an administrative claim dataset.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Depressive Disorder 2025: Comparisons with Other Treatment Guidelines.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Time series analysis of the new tiering pricing policy for generic medicines in South Korea.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Trends in antibiotic use in long-term care hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide cohort study during 2020 and 2023.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Determinants of medical costs in patients with and without fractures using Korean Senior Cohort Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- National Expenditures on Anticancer and Immunomodulating Agents During 2013-2022 in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Quinolone Use during the First Trimester of Pregnancy and the Risk of Atopic Dermatitis, Asthma, and Allergies of Offspring during 2011 to 2020.Infection & chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Serial Liver Stiffness Measurement and Fibrosis-4 Scores in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Estimation of the benefit from pre-emptive genotyping based on the nationwide cohort data in South Korea.Clinical and translational science · 2024Review
- Characteristics of High-Cost Beneficiaries of Prescription Drugs in Kazakhstan: A Cross-Sectional Study of Outpatient Data from 2022.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024Article
- Factors related to polypharmacy and hyper-polypharmacy for the elderly: A nationwide cohort study using National Health Insurance data in South Korea.Clinical and translational science · 2023Observational
- Statins and the risk of gastric, colorectal, and esophageal cancer incidence and mortality: a cohort study based on data from the Korean national health insurance claims database.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceIn OECD countries, pharmaceutical spending reached around 800 billion USD in 2013, accounting for about 20% of total spending in the retail sector. Pharmaceutical expenditures are steadily increasing in South Korea, necessitating strategies to promote efficiency.
objectiveThis study investigated factors associated with high-cost users (HCUs), who account for the majority of outpatient prescriptions in the total South Korean population. The top 20 frequently prescribed therapeutic subgroups were also investigated.
designThis is an observational study performed using health insurance claims data in 2019.
participantsIn total, 44,744,632 people (including 6,806,339 aged 65 years or older) who were prescribed outpatient medications were included. MAIN MEASURES: HCUs were defined as those for whom prescription drug costs were in the top 5%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using factors including age, insurance type, number of prescription drugs, outpatient visit days, prescription treatment days, and chronic diseases.
resultsHCUs accounted for 3.6 million (5% of the total population) and 1.4 million (21.1% of those 65 years or older). Furthermore, 4.1% of HCUs in the total population had few comorbidities. Male sex, older age, insurance (Medical Aid), comorbidities, chronic diseases, number of prescription drugs, outpatient visit days, and prescription days were all associated with an increased probability of being an HCU. The highest spending was found for B01 (antithrombotic agents) with 0.4 billion USD, followed by C10 (lipid-modifying agents) and A10 (drugs used in diabetes). The proportion of spending for HCUs among the general population was highest in L01 (antineoplastic agents), at 98.2%, and L04 (immunosuppressants), at 87.8%, whereas among the elderly, the highest proportions were found for B01 (antithrombotic agents), at 44.5%, and N06 (antidepressants), at 44.3%.
conclusionAge and multiple chronic conditions were strongly associated with HCUs, and it seems necessary to reduce drug prescriptions in patients without complex comorbidities. Several measures should target those without multiple chronic conditions who are nonetheless HCUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.