Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34704171›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2022

Short- and Long-Term Evaluation of General Practitioners' Competences After a Training in Melanoma Diagnosis: Refresher Training Sessions May Be Needed.

Evelyne Harkemanne, Corentin Duyver, Sophie Leconte, Kiswendsida Sawadogo, Marie Baeck, Isabelle Tromme

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Evelyne HarkemanneDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium. evelyne.harkemanne@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9936-9868
Corentin DuyverCentre Académique de Médecine Générale (CAMG), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie LeconteCentre Académique de Médecine Générale (CAMG), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Kiswendsida SawadogoStatistical Support Unit, King Albert II Cancer and Hematology Institute, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Marie BaeckDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Isabelle TrommeDermatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, B-1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEMédecins du Monde · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) are first-line clinicians in melanoma diagnosis. It is, therefore, important to ensure that they maintain their melanoma diagnostic accuracy over time. The objective of this study was to assess the short- and long-term competences of GPs after a training session in naked-eye melanoma diagnosis. An interventional prospective study was conducted whereby, over a 6-month period, GPs attended a 1-h melanoma diagnostic training session. To assess their acquired competences, GPs were asked to fill in a questionnaire on basic melanoma knowledge and to evaluate 10 clinical images of pigmented skin lesions prior to training, immediately after and 1 year later. In total, 89 GPs completed the questionnaire prior and immediately after training. As expected, the number of GPs who appropriately managed [Formula: see text] 50% of the melanoma cases increased after training (P < 0.001). One year after training, only 27 (30%) of the 89 GPs completed the questionnaire. This number of participants was too low to obtain significant figures but the GPs' mean overall score of appropriately managed clinical cases was much lower than in the immediate post-test. In conclusion, although this short training improved the GPs' diagnostic accuracy and management of melanoma in the short-term, participating GPs do not seem to have maintained these competences in the long-term. Further studies are needed to assess whether refresher training sessions are able to sustain acquired diagnostic and management skills.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMelanomaClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, ContinuingHumansProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesContinuing medical educationDiagnosisGeneral practitionersMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID34704171
PMCPMC8547729
OpenAlexW3209532724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.