ArticleInternational orthopaedics2022
Biomechanical study on the stability and strain conduction of intertrochanteric fracture fixed with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus triangular supporting intramedullary nail.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of Cephalomedullary Nails with Sliding Hip Screws in Surgical Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Risk factors for preoperative deep venous thrombosis in hip fracture patients: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022Pooled it
- Optimal position of intramedullary nails in the femoral head following spiral blade resection for revision of intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Analysis of factors affecting the surgical efficacy for elderly intertrochanteric fracture.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Research Progress on the Treatment of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures with Proximal Femur Bionic Nails (PFBNs).Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- A Comparative Study of the Early Postoperative Outcome of Three Intramedullary Fixation Modalities in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur in the Elderly.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2024Article
- Efficacy of poller screw in addition to lag screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail: a biomechanical evaluation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024Article
- A Controlled Variable Study of the Biomechanical Properties of the Proximal Femur before and after Cancellous Bone Removal.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Risk factors for excessive lateral migration of the blade in proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fracture.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Age-related Changes with the Trabecular Bone of Ward's Triangle and Neck-shaft Angle in the Proximal Femur: A Radiographic Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2023Article
- Proximal femoral bionic nail (PFBN)-an innovative surgical method for unstable femoral intertrochanteric fractures.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Proximal femoral bionic nail-a novel internal fixation system for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Comment on Shi et al.: Association of the lateral wall integrity with clinical outcomes in older patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia.International orthopaedics · 2022Article
- A comparative Study of Novel Extramedullary Fixation and Dynamic Hip Screw in the Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Finite-Element Analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBased on the features of the three-dimensional spatial structure of the proximal femoral trabeculae, we developed a bionic triangular supporting intramedullary nail (TSIN) for the treatment of the femoral intertrochanteric fracture. The current study aimed to compare the mechanical stability and restoration of mechanical conduction between proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and TSIN to fix the intertrochanteric fractures.
methodsFirstly, five sets of PFNA and TSIN with the same size were selected and fixed on a biomechanical testing machine, and strain gauges were pasted on the main nail, lag screw, and supporting screw to load to the vertical load to 600 N, and the displacement and strain values were recorded. Secondly, formalin-preserved femurs were selected, and the left and right femurs of the same cadaver were randomly divided into two groups to prepare intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO classification 31-A1), which were fixed with PFNA (n = 15) and TSIN (n = 15), respectively. Sixteen sites around the fracture line were chosen to paste strain gauges and loaded vertically to 600 N, and then, the fracture fragment displacement and strain values were recorded. Finally, a 10,000-cycle test ranging from 10 to 600 N was conducted, and the cycle number and displacement value were recorded.
resultsThe overall displacement of PFNA was 2.17 ± 0.18 mm, which was significantly greater than the displacement of the TSIN group (1.66 ± 0.05 mm, P < 0.05) under a vertical load of 600 N. The strain below the PFNA lag screw was 868.29 ± 147.85, which was significantly greater than that of the TSIN (456.02 ± 35.06, P < 0.05); the strain value at the medial side of the PFNA nail was 444.00 ± 34.23, which was significantly less than that of the TSIN (613.57 ± 108.00, P < 0.05). Under the vertical load of 600 N, the displacement of the fracture fragments of the PFNA group was 0.95 ± 0.25 mm, which was significantly greater than that of the TSIN group (0.41 ± 0.09 mm, P < 0.05). The femoral specimens in the PFNA group showed significantly greater strains at the anterior (1, 2, and 4), lateral (7, 9, and 10), posterior (11), and medial (15 and 16) sites than those in the TSIN group (all P < 0.05). In the cyclic compression experiment, the displacements of the PFNA group at 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, and 10,000 cycles were 1.38 mm, 1.81 mm, 2.07 mm, 2.64 mm, and 3.58 mm, respectively, which were greater than the corresponding displacements of the TSIN group: 1.01 mm, 1.48 mm, 1.82 mm, 2.05 mm, and 2.66 mm (P
conclusionsThe current study showed that TSIN had apparent advantages in stability and stress conduction. TSIN enhanced the stability of intertrochanteric fractures, particularly in superior fracture fragments, improved stress conduction, reduced the stress in the anterior and medial femur, and restored the biomechanical properties of the femur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34704144What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.