ReviewSkeletal radiology2022
Diagnosis, imaging, and potential morbidities of the hallux interphalangeal joint os interphalangeus.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is the Hallux Interphalangeal Ossicle Clinically Relevant? A Cross-Sectional Study on Its Prevalence and Biomechanical Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Micropattern Silk Fibroin Film Facilitates Tendon RepairStem cells international · 2023Article
- Hallux Valgus Interphalangeus with Large Ossicle Formation: A Case Report.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hallux pain is a common entity with a differential diagnoses including hallux valgus, hallux limitus/rigidus, and gout and specifically at the interphalangeal joint (IPJ), flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tenosynovitis, and joint arthrosis. An under-recognized source of pain is the os interphalangeus, an ossicle typically located at the plantar aspect of the hallucal interphalangeal joint. This ossicle is radiographically visible in its ossified form in 2-13% of individuals, but can also be present as an ossified or non-ossified nodule in patients. The os interphalangeus may be centrally or eccentrically located, and although originally believed to be a sesamoid bone in the FHL tendon, it is an ossicle located in the joint capsule of the IPJ and separated from the tendon by a bursa. When the ossicle is absent, the bursa is also absent and the tendon is attached to the joint capsule. Infrequently, the os may be located eccentrically under the first IPJ and reflect persistence of one of the distal phalanx. Rarely, the os interphalangeus may be dorsal to the IPJ. The os interphalangeus is best evaluated on radiographs, ultrasound, and MRI. Pain is a result of altered mechanics with arthrosis or frictional effects with bursitis, tenosynovitis, or intractable plantar keratosis (IPK). The ossicle may also displace into a dislocated IPJ, preventing reduction. The os interphalangeus may be centrally or eccentrically located, and although originally believed to be a sesamoid bone. This has been found within the plantar joint capsule of the distal hallucal interphalangeal joint and separated from the tendon by a bursa. Uncommonly, the location may be plantar eccentric and reflect persistence of one of the ossification centers of the distal phalanx. Although the ossicle can be imaged with standard AP and lateral radiographs in many cases, in those cases of unexplained pain with no radiographically visible ossicle, and the presence of friction blisters, intractable plantar keratosis (IPK), hyper-extension of the IPJ, hallux limitus/rigidus, or metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis, an MRI or CT should be considered to identify a non-ossified fibrocartilaginous node. This is of particular concern in a patient with a history of underling diabetes mellitus or other metabolic disorders associated with diminished pedal sensation where neurotrophic changes place them most at risk for complications associated with excessive plantar pressure. Pain is a result of altered biomechanics with arthrosis, or frictional effects causing bursitis, tenosynovitis, or IPK. The ossicle may also displace into a dislocated IPJ, preventing reduction. In this article, we will describe the anatomy and imaging appearance of the common os interphalangeus variants and associated complications including frictional effects, arthrosis, and IPK and discuss conservative and surgical management of a symptomatic ossicle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.