ArticleSTAR protocols2021
Protocol for using NoBadWordsCombiner to merge and minimize "bad words" from BLAST hits against multiple eukaryotic gene annotation databases.
Article in STAR protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Annotating protein-coding genes can be challenging, especially when searching for the best hits against multiple functional databases. This is partly because of "bad words" appearing as top hits, such as hypothetical or uncharacterized proteins. To help alleviate some of these issues, we designed a bioinformatics tool called NoBadWordsCombiner, which efficiently merges the hits from various databases, strengthening gene definitions by minimizing functional descriptions containing "bad words." Unlike other available tools, NoBadWordsCombiner is user friendly, but it does require users to have some general bioinformatics skills, including a basic understanding of the BLAST package and dash shell in Linux/Unix environments. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Zhang et al. (2021a).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.