Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34704041›Full record

ReviewRSC chemical biology2021

Faster, better, and cheaper: harnessing microfluidics and mass spectrometry for biotechnology.

Noel S Ha, Markus de Raad, La Zhen Han, Amber Golini, Christopher J Petzold, Trent R Northen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. 3D printed microfluidic devices with electrodes for electrochemical analysis.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application of Microfluidics for Bacterial Identification.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noel S HaBiological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA trnorthen@lbl.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3275-577X
Markus de RaadEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Biosciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-9198
La Zhen HanEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Biosciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8740-3467
Amber GoliniEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Biosciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA.
Christopher J PetzoldBiological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA trnorthen@lbl.gov.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8270-5228
Trent R NorthenBiological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA USA trnorthen@lbl.gov.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening technologies are widely used for elucidating biological activities. These typically require trade-offs in assay specificity and sensitivity to achieve higher throughput. Microfluidic approaches enable rapid manipulation of small volumes and have found a wide range of applications in biotechnology providing improved control of reaction conditions, faster assays, and reduced reagent consumption. The integration of mass spectrometry with microfluidics has the potential to create high-throughput, sensitivity, and specificity assays. This review introduces the widely-used mass spectrometry ionization techniques that have been successfully integrated with microfluidics approaches such as continuous-flow system, microchip electrophoresis, droplet microfluidics, digital microfluidics, centrifugal microfluidics, and paper microfluidics. In addition, we discuss recent applications of microfluidics integrated with mass spectrometry in single-cell analysis, compound screening, and the study of microorganisms. Lastly, we provide future outlooks towards online coupling, improving the sensitivity and integration of multi-omics into a single platform.

Identifiers

PMID34704041
PMCPMC8496484
OpenAlexW3186255463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.