Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34704012›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2021

The use of heat to deliver fentanyl via pulmonary drug delivery.

Amina Vazda, Wei Xia, Håkan Engqvist

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Dry powder inhaler design and particle technology in enhancing Pulmonary drug deposition: challenges and future strategies.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Rats chasing the dragon: A new heroin inhalation method.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amina VazdaDivision of Applied Materials Science, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75121 Uppsala, Sweden.
Wei XiaDivision of Applied Materials Science, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75121 Uppsala, Sweden.
Håkan EngqvistDivision of Applied Materials Science, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75121 Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The golden standard to treat acute pain is by intravenous drug delivery of opioids such as fentanyl or morphine. Intravenous drug delivery requires the placement of an intravenous (IV) port, which can cause infections, dislodgments, and distress to the patients, and therefore a non-invasive method is desirable. Pulmonary drug delivery is a non-invasive method that has been shown to be a good alternative to intravenous administration. New devices have been investigated for treating acute pain by delivering fentanyl by heat. The pure drug, fentanyl, is applied onto a surface which is then heated up to 350 °C and inhaled, resulting in no formation of degradation products. Furthermore, forced degradation of fentanyl has been studied which showed that longer heating time and higher temperatures will result in the formation of degradation products. The evidence indicates that heat can be used to deliver drugs to the lungs where fast onset reaction can be obtained giving fast and non-invasive pain relief.

Indexed as

Acute painFentanylInhalation

Identifiers

PMID34704012
PMCPMC8521112
OpenAlexW3205038424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.