ArticleJB & JS open access
Custom 3D-Printed Triflange Implants for Treatment of Severe Acetabular Defects, with and without Pelvic Discontinuity: Early Results of Our First 19 Consecutive Cases.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Custom-Made 3D-Printed Implants for Paprosky Type 3A and 3B Acetabular Defects: Early Surgical and Functional Outcomes from a Multicentre Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Use of Custom-Designed Additive-Manufactured Acetabular Components for Reconstruction of Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defects in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Finite Element Analysis of a 3D-Printed Acetabular Prosthesis for an Acetabular Defect According to the Paprosky Classification.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A systematic review of custom 3D-printed acetabular components in revision arthroplasty for the management of extensive acetabular defects.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Review
- Custom 3D-printed split-type triflange implants for severe acetabular defects: mid-term clinical outcomes and biomechanical insights from finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Cemented dual-mobility total hip arthroplasty cups in a custom-made acetabulum: a clinical and radiological evaluation.SICOT-J · 2025Article
- 3D-printed Personalized Porous Acetabular Component to Reconstruct Extensive Acetabular Bone Defects in Primary Hip Arthroplasty.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- A review of the design, manufacture, and outcomes of custom total joint replacement implants available in the United States.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Review
- Article
- The Use of Calcium Sulfate/Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft Substitute to Restore Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Custom triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 1218 patients.EFORT open reviews · 2023Article
- Custom 3D-Printed Implants for Acetabular Reconstruction: Intermediate-Term Functional and Radiographic Results.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Treatment of massive acetabular defects, both with and without pelvic discontinuity, is challenging. The implants utilized in the surgical procedure need to be stable and integrate with poor host bone stock. In the present study, we describe our experience addressing this challenge.
methodsWe identified all patients who underwent surgical implantation of a custom 3D-printed triflange prosthesis with dual-mobility bearings for the treatment of Paprosky 3B acetabular defects between 2014 and 2020. Operative, functional, and radiographic outcomes were assessed.
resultsA total of 19 patients were identified, including 11 women. The mean age was 77 years (range, 53 to 91 years), and 8 patients (42%) had proven or likely pelvic discontinuity. The mean follow-up was 53 months (range, 17 to 88 months; mode, 57 months). The cumulative implant survivorship was 100%. Two patients suffered notable sciatic nerve palsy, with 1 case being recurrent. There were no dislocations or fractures. The mean Oxford Hip Score improved significantly, from a mean of 8.6 (range, 0 to 22) preoperatively to 35 (range, 10 to 48) postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Radiographically, there was excellent correlation between implant position and the preoperative plan (p > 0.05). There were no cases of implant loosening or migration, which suggests that stabilization was achieved even among cases with pelvic discontinuity.
conclusionsThese early results suggest that the use of a custom 3D-printed triflange implant has potential advantages over traditional constructs in the treatment of massive acetabular defects, with and without pelvic discontinuity. Excellent implant survivorship and functional improvement were demonstrated in this challenging patient cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.