Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34703835›Full record

ReviewOpen forum infectious diseases2021

Revising Conventional Wisdom About Histoplasmosis in the United States.

Kaitlin Benedict, Mitsuru Toda, Brendan R Jackson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open forum infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pulmonary Histoplasmosis, Taiwan, 1997-2024.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026
    Observational
  5. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis by next-generation sequencing of microbial cell-free DNA in Texas.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Histoplasmosis.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaitlin BenedictMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0458-2493
Mitsuru TodaMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brendan R JacksonMycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies performed during the 1940s-1960s continue to serve as the foundation of the epidemiology of histoplasmosis given that many knowledge gaps persist regarding its geographic distribution, prevalence, and burden in the United States. We explore 3 long-standing, frequently cited, and somewhat incomplete epidemiologic beliefs about histoplasmosis: (1) histoplasmosis is the most common endemic mycosis in the United States, (2) histoplasmosis is endemic to the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys, and (3) histoplasmosis is associated with bird or bat droppings. We also summarize recent insights about the clinical spectrum of histoplasmosis and changes in underlying conditions associated with the severe forms. Continuing to identify prevention opportunities will require better epidemiologic data, better diagnostic testing, and greater awareness about this neglected disease among health care providers, public health professionals, and the general public.

Indexed as

epidemiologyhistoplasmosisUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34703835
PMCPMC8538056
OpenAlexW3167825120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.