ArticleCureus2021
Diabetes Self-Management Among Healthcare Providers in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validation of the Arabic version of the diabetes self-management questionnaire in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetes Self-Management in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Diabetes mellitus (DM), a chronic metabolic disease, is a rising global concern with significant social, economic, and health implications. Proper glycemic control is crucial to guarantee protection against these implications such as micro and macrovascular complications. To achieve proper glycemic control, patients' self-management is probably the most essential component, and the development of appropriate self-management behaviors which include medication adherence and lifestyle modifications improves the prognosis and the incidence of DM complications. Objective The aim of the study is to examine diabetes self-management and control of diabetic healthcare providers from different specialties working at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Design and setting This is a cross-sectional pilot study carried out in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using a pre-validated self-administered questionnaire that was "Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire" (DSMQ), which examined diabetes management and control within the last two months. The questionnaire was distributed to the healthcare providers of all specialties at the site of the study. Correlations and descriptive analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, USA). Results The total number of participants was 370 healthcare providers (100% response rate). It was found that 26 (7%) of them had diabetes (92.3% of them with type 2 diabetes). The diabetic participants' mean age was 48.58±7.3 years old. 42.3% were applied medical sciences specialists, with 38.5% having years of experience between 16 to 20 years old. 26.3% were Saudi nationals. The mean HbA1c levels among diabetic patients were 6±1.03%, ranging between (5.1%-9%). There was a significant inverse relationship between each section's scores and total scores with the HbA1c levels (p-value<0.05). Total scores for adherence were significantly higher among the age group (51 to 60) (p-value=0.03) and physicians (p-value=0.035). Dietary control was significantly better among age group (51 to 60) (p-value=0.015), and type 2 diabetes (p-value=0.022). Physician contact was significantly higher in the age group (51 to 60) (p-value=0.027). Physical activity was significantly higher among physicians (p-value=0.030). Blood glucose monitoring was significantly better among the age group (above 60) (p-value=0.026), males (p-value=0.03), and physicians (p-value=0.039). Conclusion The findings suggest the glycemic control and adherence to treatment among diabetic healthcare providers in KAMC-Riyadh are adequate the findings suggest the glycemic control and adherence to treatment among diabetic healthcare providers in KAMC-Riyadh are adequate. Future studies with an adequate sample size are essential to assess diabetes self-management and identify if there is any obstacle toward better compliance in healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.