ArticleKardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery2021
Factors influencing the effect of surgical treatment in secondary proliferative disease with lung involvement.
Article in Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomized controlled trial: a systematic review of published responses.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022Pooled it
- The usefulness of progression-free survival in surgical treatment of lung metastases.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSurgical treatment of neoplastic lung metastases is a big therapeutic problem, at the stage of qualifying for the procedure, in the surgical technique itself, and in the tactics of managing subsequent disease relapses. The most doubtful aspect is determining which factors influence the prolongation of survival in patients with such a diagnosis.
aimTo determine which factors influence the effectiveness of surgical treatment of neoplastic metastases to the lungs. MATERIAL AND
methodsA group of 577 patients was subjected to the study. An analysis of all performed operations (1009) was also carried out according to the set goals. Statistical analysis was performed using the estimates of the χ
resultsIt was established what statistically significant factors may improve the treatment effectiveness. It was found that the lack of radicalism was influenced by: the number of lung metastases, the presence of changes in the lymph nodes, age, histology of the primary tumor and its location, and the number of treatments. Nodal metastases are more common in non-radical procedures, depend on the patient's age, are more often found in unilateral procedures, and depend on the location and histology of the primary tumor.
conclusionsIt was found that the radical nature of the procedure did not affect the progression of the disease, but it did have an impact on survival. Relapses are more common in bilateral procedures, reducing survival. Lymph node metastases worsen the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.