Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34703328›Full record

ReviewOrthopedic research and reviews2021

Utilization of Internal Bracing in Elbow Medial UCL Stabilization: From Biomechanics to Clinical Application and Patient Outcomes.

Andre Anvari, Amir Fathi, Ioanna K Bolia, Eric Piatt, Laith K Hasan, Aryan Haratian, Alexander E Weber, Frank A Petrigliano

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopedic research and reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andre AnvariUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amir FathiUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ioanna K BoliaUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9410-1421
Eric PiattUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Laith K HasanUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Aryan HaratianUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alexander E WeberUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Frank A PetriglianoUSC Epstein Family Center for Sports Medicine at Keck Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Keck Hospital of USC · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction has been successfully utilized to treat symptomatic UCL insufficiency in overhead athletes. Despite the overall success of the procedure, attempts have been made to improve upon the original technique with the goal of hastening return to sport. Most recently, there has been interest in repairing or reconstructing the native ligament with internal brace (IB) augmentation. Biomechanical cadaveric studies assessing UCL repair with IB augmentation have attempted to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment; however, the literature is seemingly divided on its benefit. Preliminary clinical studies suggest internal bracing may allow a faster return to sport than conventional techniques. The purpose of this review was to provide an analysis of the current evidence on IB augmentation in UCL repair of the elbow as it pertains to biomechanical advantages/disadvantages, reported surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes in comparison with traditional UCL reconstruction techniques.

Indexed as

elbowinternal bracereturn to sportUCL

Identifiers

PMID34703328
PMCPMC8541765
OpenAlexW3207426962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.