Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34703295›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2021

Facilitate Signing with the Family Doctor: A Study of the Practice in Shanghai, China.

Huimin Dai, Lan Tang, Zhaoxin Wang, Xiaoming Sun, Fang Zhang, Min Zhu, Qian Huang, Bing Hu, Linqiang Wang, Xianqin Fu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of general medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huimin DaiShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Lan TangShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Zhaoxin WangSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoming SunSchool of Public Health, Fu Dan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Fang ZhangShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Min ZhuShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Qian HuangShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Bing HuShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Linqiang WangShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Xianqin FuShanghai Pudong Weifang Community Health Center, Shanghai, 200120, People's Republic of China.
Li LuoSchool of Public Health, Fu Dan University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200433, People's Republic of China.
Jianwei ShiSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the time since primary care was implemented in China in 2009, programs of promoting residents signing with family doctor services have been key. However, there has been a lack of effective evaluation of its implementation.

methodsWe used mixed methods for evaluating existing measures of facilitating signing with family doctors in Shanghai. Based on the Donabedian model, qualitative informant interviews were conducted to obtain experts' evaluations in aspects of team construction (structure) and innovative solutions for promoting and supervising signings (process). Quantitative data were used to analyse the utilization situation (outcome) from "Shanghai Family Doctor Signing Data Platform".

resultsMeasures of signing with family doctors in Shanghai have functioned well, but there is still a lack of sufficient family doctors and specialists, including paediatricians and gynaecologists. Although proportions of the key population (average=62.59%) and the elderly population (>65 years) (average=78.10%) who had signed with family doctors were relatively high, the proportion of the permanent resident population (average=29.36%) who had signed with family doctors was low from 2017 to 2020 in Shanghai. The proportions of residents seeking medical advice in signed community health centres in outskirts (71.08%) were higher than those in suburbs (63.51%) and urban areas (53.49%), whereas the proportion of those seeking medical advice from recommended multiple medical institutions were similarly low in urban areas, outskirts and suburbs.

conclusionThe practice of facilitate signing with family doctors in Shanghai has increased. However, we showed that numbers of family doctors were relatively low, and there remains a need for more experienced gynaecology and paediatrics professionals, compared with Western countries. Additionally, efforts should be made to increase proportions of residents who utilize the program, especially in urban areas, and seek medical services in contracted group hospitals and community health centres.

Indexed as

evaluationfamily doctor servicepracticeprimary care

Identifiers

PMID34703295
PMCPMC8536883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.