Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34703224›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2021

Phytosomes as Innovative Delivery Systems for Phytochemicals: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.

Mahmood Barani, Enrico Sangiovanni, Marco Angarano, Mohammad Amin Rajizadeh, Mehrnaz Mehrabani, Stefano Piazza, Hosahalli Veerabhadrappa Gangadharappa, Abbas Pardakhty, Mehrzad Mehrbani, Mario Dell'Agli and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 92 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
92citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

92 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Enhancing Antibacterial Activity ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in Drug Delivery Systems for Boswellic Acids fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Development and Characterization ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation ofFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Effect ofBiomolecules · 2025
    Article

32 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mahmood BaraniMedical Mycology and Bacteriology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, 76169-13555, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1711-2522
Enrico SangiovanniDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Marco AngaranoDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8632-4660
Mohammad Amin RajizadehStudent Research Committee, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mehrnaz MehrabaniPhysiology Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Stefano PiazzaDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20133, Italy.
Hosahalli Veerabhadrappa GangadharappaDepartment of Pharmaceutics, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education and Research, Mysuru, India.
Abbas PardakhtyPharmaceutics Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1848-5961
Mehrzad MehrbaniDepartment of Traditional Medicine, Faculty of Traditional Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Mario Dell'AgliDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-402X
Mohammad Hadi NematollahiHerbal and Traditional Medicines Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9529-4077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, medicinal herbs and their phytochemicals have emerged as a great therapeutic option for many disorders. However, poor bioavailability and selectivity might limit their clinical application. Therefore, bioavailability is considered a notable challenge to improve bio-efficacy in transporting dietary phytochemicals. Different methods have been proposed for generating effective carrier systems to enhance the bioavailability of phytochemicals. Among them, nano-vesicles have been introduced as promising candidates for the delivery of insoluble phytochemicals. Due to the easy preparation of the bilayer vesicles and their adaptability, they have been widely used and approved by the scientific literature. The first part of the review is focused on introducing phytosome technology as well as its applications, with emphasis on principles of formulations and characterization. The second part provides a wide overview of biological activities of commercial and non-commercial phytosomes, divided by systems and related pathologies. These results confirm the greater effectiveness of phytosomes, both in terms of biological activity or reduced dosage, highlighting curcumin and silymarin as the most formulated compounds. Finally, we describe the promising clinical and experimental findings regarding the applications of phytosomes. The conclusion of this study encourages the researchers to transfer their knowledge from laboratories to market, for a further development of these products.

Indexed as

CurcuminSilymarinBiological AvailabilityDrug CompoundingPhytochemicalsCurcuminPhytochemicalsSilymarindeliverydiseasenanomedicinephytochemicalphytosomevesicle

Identifiers

PMID34703224
PMCPMC8527653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.