Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34703161›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2021

The effect of COVID-19: Adopted changes and their impact on management of musculoskeletal oncology care at a tertiary referral centre.

Ashwin Prajapati, Srinath Gupta, Prakash Nayak, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashwin PrajapatiBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Srinath GuptaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Prakash NayakBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Ashish GuliaBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Ajay PuriBone and Soft Tissue Services, Dept of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic has disrupted access to healthcare. Delay in diagnosis and onset of care increases cancer related mortality. We aim to analyse its impact on patient profile, hospital visits, morbidity in surgically treated patients and process outcomes.

methodsWe analysed an ambi-directional cohort from 16th March to June 30, 2020 (Pandemic cohort, PC) as compared to 2019 (Pre-pandemic cohort, PPC). We measured, new patient registrations, proportion of 'within state' patients vs 'rest of India', median time to treatment decision, proportion of patients seeking 'second opinions', modality of initial treatment (surgery/radiotherapy/chemotherapy), 30-day post-operative morbidity/mortality and conversion of inpatient-to 'teleconsult' in the PC.

resultsBetween the 2 cohorts, new registrations declined from 235 to 69 (70% reduction). The percentage of 'within state' patients increased from 41.7% to 53.6% (11.9% increase). There was a decline in second opinion consults from 25% to 16%. The median time to decision-making decreased to 16 days in PC vs 20 days in PPC (20% reduction). Surgery was the first line of treatment in 40% as compared to 34% in the PPC with a mean time to surgery of 24 days in PC compared to 36 days in PPC (33% reduction). 66 surgeries were performed in the PC compared to 132 in the PPC. Thirty day post operative morbidity needing readmission remained similar (18% PC, vs 17% PPC). Perioperative intensive care remained similar in both cohorts. Teleconsultation was deemed medically safe in 92.8% (439/473 patients).

conclusionsThe COVID 19 pandemic has substantially reduced access and onset to cancer care. Post operative morbidity and mortality did not seem to worsen with triage. Teleconsultation is an effective tool in optimizing follow up strategy.

Indexed as

AccessBone tumorCOVIDDelayPolicySarcomaTeleconsultationTreatment

Identifiers

PMID34703161
PMCPMC8531238
OpenAlexW3210672836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.