Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702964›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2021

Obesity in pregnant women: a 20-year analysis of the German experience.

Alexander Strauss, Niels Rochow, Mirjam Kunze, Volker Hesse, Joachim W Dudenhausen, Manfred Voigt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Kidney disease and reproductive health.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Obesity in prenatal medicine: a game changer?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander StraussFaculty of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, Germany. astrauss@email.uni-kiel.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6943-2862
Niels RochowDepartment of Pediatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital, Nuremberg, Germany.
Mirjam KunzeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Freiburg School of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Volker HesseGerman Center for Growth, Development and Health Encouragement during Childhood and Youth, Berlin, Germany.
Joachim W DudenhausenDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité University School of Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Manfred VoigtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Freiburg School of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
University of Freiburg · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveTo investigate the longitudinal development of maternal body weight and analyze the influence of obesity on obstetrics during more than two decades in Germany. SUBJECTS/

methodsData collected from the Federal state of Schleswig-Holstein (German Perinatal Survey) were analyzed with regard to the dynamics of maternal anthropometric variables (body weight, BMI) between 1995-7 and 2004-17. In total 335,511 mothers substantiated the presented study-collective. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY.

resultsMaternal BMI advanced significantly over the study period. Among a rise in mean periconceptional body weight (67.6-72.0 kg), the segment of obese women increased disproportionately (in average 9.4-19.2%). Despite the observed trend to late giving birth (mean maternal age 1995: 29.3 vs. 30.7 years in 2017), it was not advanced maternal age but parity that influenced the continuous increase in maternal weight (mean maternal body weight 1995-7: primi- bi-, multiparae 67.4, 68.3 and 69.0 kg vs. 2004-17: primi- bi-, multiparae 70.0, 71.5 and 73.2 kg respectively).

conclusionObesity is a major problem on health issues in obstetrics. Advancing maternal BMI, increasing mother's age and derived prenatal risks considerably complicate pregnancy and delivery. It has to be emphasized that its consequences do not end with delivery or childbed, but represent a livelong burden to the mother and their offspring. Hence, multimodal strategies to reduce/control periconceptional body weight are mandatory.

Indexed as

Pregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleBirth WeightBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansObesityParityPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34702964
PMCPMC8636254
OpenAlexW3208846035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.