Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702901›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Identification of SSRI-evoked antidepressant sensory signals by decoding vagus nerve activity.

Christine L West, Karen-Anne McVey Neufeld, Yu-Kang Mao, Andrew M Stanisz, Paul Forsythe, John Bienenstock, Denise Barbut, Michael Zasloff, Wolfgang A Kunze

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Gut-brain communication: types of sensory nerves and mechanisms of activation.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effects of Two Distinct Psychoactive Microbes,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine L WestBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Karen-Anne McVey NeufeldBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Yu-Kang MaoBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Andrew M StaniszBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Paul ForsytheBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
John BienenstockBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Denise BarbutEnterin, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael ZasloffEnterin, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Wolfgang A KunzeBrain-Body Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada. kunzew@mcmaster.ca.
McMaster University · CASt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAGeorgetown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vagus nerve relays mood-altering signals originating in the gut lumen to the brain. In mice, an intact vagus is required to mediate the behavioural effects of both intraluminally applied selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and a strain of Lactobacillus with antidepressant-like activity. Similarly, the prodepressant effect of lipopolysaccharide is vagus nerve dependent. Single vagal fibres are broadly tuned to respond by excitation to both anti- and prodepressant agents, but it remains unclear how neural responses encode behaviour-specific information. Here we demonstrate using ex vivo experiments that for single vagal fibres within the mesenteric neurovascular bundle supplying the mouse small intestine, a unique neural firing pattern code is common to both chemical and bacterial vagus-dependent antidepressant luminal stimuli. This code is qualitatively and statistically discernible from that evoked by lipopolysaccharide, a non-vagus-dependent antidepressant or control non-antidepressant Lactobacillus strain and are not affected by sex status. We found that all vagus dependent antidepressants evoked a decrease in mean spike interval, increase in spike burst duration, decrease in gap duration between bursts and increase in intra-burst spike intervals. Our results offer a novel neuronal electrical perspective as one explanation for mechanisms of action of gut-derived vagal dependent antidepressants. We expect that our ex vivo individual vagal fibre recording model will improve the design and operation of new, extant electroceutical vagal stimulation devices currently used to treat major depression. Furthermore, use of this vagal antidepressant code should provide a valuable screening tool for novel potential oral antidepressant candidates in preclinical animal models.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAction PotentialsAnimalsFemaleLactobacillusMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CVagus NerveAntidepressive AgentsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34702901
PMCPMC8548562
OpenAlexW3209410082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.