ArticleScientific reports2021
Accurate prediction of protein torsion angles using evolutionary signatures and recurrent neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeepRNA-Twist: language-model-guided RNA torsion angle prediction with attention-inception network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Parameterized hypercomplex convolutional network for accurate protein backbone torsion angle prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Shared structural features of Miro binding control mitochondrial homeostasis.The EMBO journal · 2024Article
- SAINT-Angle: self-attention augmented inception-inside-inception network and transfer learning improve protein backbone torsion angle prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The amino acid sequence of a protein contains all the necessary information to specify its shape, which dictates its biological activities. However, it is challenging and expensive to experimentally determine the three-dimensional structure of proteins. The backbone torsion angles play a critical role in protein structure prediction, and accurately predicting the angles can considerably advance the tertiary structure prediction by accelerating efficient sampling of the large conformational space for low energy structures. Here we first time propose evolutionary signatures computed from protein sequence profiles, and a novel recurrent architecture, termed ESIDEN, that adopts a straightforward architecture of recurrent neural networks with a small number of learnable parameters. The ESIDEN can capture efficient information from both the classic and new features benefiting from different recurrent architectures in processing information. On the other hand, compared to widely used classic features, the new features, especially the Ramachandran basin potential, provide statistical and evolutionary information to improve prediction accuracy. On four widely used benchmark datasets, the ESIDEN significantly improves the accuracy in predicting the torsion angles by comparison to the best-so-far methods. As demonstrated in the present study, the predicted angles can be used as structural constraints to accurately infer protein tertiary structures. Moreover, the proposed features would pave the way to improve machine learning-based methods in protein folding and structure prediction, as well as function prediction. The source code and data are available at the website https://kornmann.bioch.ox.ac.uk/leri/resources/download.html .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.