Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702331›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation (FUTURE study): a superiority randomised clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of invasive urodynamic investigations in management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms.

M Abdel-Fattah, C Chapple, K Guerrero, S Dixon, N Cotterill, K Ward, H Hashim, A Monga, K Brown, M J Drake and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

M Abdel-FattahAberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. future@abdn.ac.uk.
C ChappleDepartment of Urology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
K GuerreroDepartment of Urogynaecology, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
S DixonHealth Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
N CotterillBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
K WardWarrell Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
H HashimBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
A MongaDepartment of Gynaecology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
K BrownDepartment of Gynaecology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK.
M J DrakeBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
A GammieBristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
A MostafaAberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
U K Bladder HealthBladder Health UK, Registered charity, Birmingham, UK.
S BreemanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
D CooperCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
G MacLennanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
J NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GBSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Health Technology Assessment Programme 15/150/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOveractive bladder (OAB) syndrome is a symptom complex affecting 12-14% of the UK adult female population. Symptoms include urinary urgency, with or without urgency incontinence, increased daytime urinary frequency and nocturia. OAB has a negative impact on women's social, physical, and psychological wellbeing. Initial treatment includes lifestyle modifications, bladder retraining, pelvic floor exercises and pharmacological therapy. However, these measures are unsuccessful in 25-40% of women (refractory OAB). Before considering invasive treatments, such as Botulinum toxin injection or sacral neuromodulation, most guidelines recommend urodynamics to confirm diagnosis of detrusor overactivity (DO). However, urodynamics may fail to show evidence of DO in up to 45% of cases, hence the need to evaluate its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. FUTURE (Female Urgency, Trial of Urodynamics as Routine Evaluation) aims to test the hypothesis that, in women with refractory OAB, urodynamics and comprehensive clinical assessment is associated with superior patient-reported outcomes following treatment and is more cost-effective, compared to comprehensive clinical assessment only.

methodsFUTURE is a pragmatic, multi-centre, superiority randomised controlled trial. Women aged ≥ 18 years with refractory OAB or urgency predominant mixed urinary incontinence, and who have failed/not tolerated conservative and medical treatment, are considered for trial entry. We aim to recruit 1096 women from approximately 60 secondary/tertiary care hospitals across the UK. All consenting women will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 15 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is participant-reported success at 15 months post-randomisation measured using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 15 months. The secondary outcomes include adverse events, impact on other urinary symptoms and health-related quality of life. Qualitative interviews with participants and clinicians and a health economic evaluation will also be conducted. The statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be by intention-to-treat. Results will be presented as estimates and 95% CIs. DISCUSSION: The FUTURE study will inform patients, clinicians and policy makers whether routine urodynamics improves treatment outcomes in women with refractory OAB and whether it is cost-effective.

trial registrationISRCTN63268739 . Registered on 14 September 2017.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder, OveractiveUrodynamicsAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, UrgeFemaleFilling cystometryOveractive bladderRandomised controlled trialUrodynamicsUroflowmetry

Identifiers

PMID34702331
PMCPMC8546752
OpenAlexW3210286765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.