Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702320›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

Screw tightness and stripping rates vary between biomechanical researchers and practicing orthopaedic surgeons.

James W A Fletcher, Verena Neumann, Lisa Wenzel, Boyko Gueorguiev, R Geoff Richards, Harinderjit S Gill, Michael R Whitehouse, Ezio Preatoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

James W A FletcherApplied Biomechanics Suite, Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. jwaf20@bath.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5013
Verena NeumannAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Lisa WenzelAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
R Geoff RichardsAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Harinderjit S GillDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Michael R WhitehouseMusculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Southmead Hospital, 1st Floor Learning & Research Building, Bristol, UK.
Ezio PreatoniApplied Biomechanics Suite, Department for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
AO Foundation · CHUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScrews are the most frequently inserted orthopaedic implants. Biomechanical, laboratory-based studies are used to provide a controlled environment to investigate revolutionary and evolutionary improvements in orthopaedic techniques. Predominantly, biomechanical trained, non-surgically practicing researchers perform these studies, whilst it will be orthopaedic surgeons who will put these procedures into practice on patients. Limited data exist on the comparative performance of surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers when inserting screws. Furthermore, any variation in performance by surgeons and/or biomechanical researchers may create an underappreciated confounder to biomechanical research findings. This study aimed to identify the differences between surgically and non-surgically trained biomechanical researchers' achieved screw tightness and stripping rates with different fixation methods.

methodsTen orthopaedic surgeons and 10 researchers inserted 60 cortical screws each into artificial bone, for three different screw diameters (2.7, 3.5 and 4.5 mm), with 50% of screws inserted through plates and 50% through washers. Screw tightness, screw hole stripping rates and confidence in screw purchase were recorded. Three members of each group also inserted 30 screws using an augmented screwdriver, which indicated when optimum tightness was achieved.

resultsUnstripped screw tightness for orthopaedic surgeons and researchers was 82% (n = 928, 95% CI 81-83) and 76% (n = 1470, 95% CI 75-76) respectively (p < 0.001); surgeons stripped 48% (872/1800) of inserted screws and researchers 18% (330/1800). Using washers was associated with increased tightness [80% (95% CI 80-81), n = 1196] compared to screws inserted through plates [76% (95% CI 75-77), n = 1204] (p < 0.001). Researchers were more accurate in their overall assessment of good screw insertion (86% vs. 62%). No learning effect occurred when comparing screw tightness for the first 10 insertions against the last 10 insertions for any condition (p = 0.058-0.821). Augmented screwdrivers, indicating optimum tightness, reduced stripping rates from 34 to 21% (p < 0.001). Experience was not associated with improved performance in screw tightness or stripping rates for either group (p = 0.385-0.965).

conclusionsSurgeons and researchers showed different screw tightness under the same in vitro conditions, with greater rates of screw hole stripping by surgeons. This may have important implications for the reproducibility and transferability of research findings from different settings depending on who undertakes the experiments.

Indexed as

Bone ScrewsClinical CompetenceOrthopedic SurgeonsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone and BonesHumansReproducibility of ResultsTorqueResearcherScrewStripping rateSurgeonTightnessTorque

Identifiers

PMID34702320
PMCPMC8549396
OpenAlexW3207505253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.