Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702295›Full record

ArticlePopulation health metrics2021

How to measure premature mortality? A proposal combining "relative" and "absolute" approaches.

Stefano Mazzuco, Marc Suhrcke, Lucia Zanotto

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health metrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Prevalence and mortality of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome in US adults, 1999-2018.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Trends in Avoidable Mortality in Kazakhstan From 2015 to 2021.International journal of health policy and management · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefano MazzucoDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Cesare Battisti 241, 35121, Padua, Italy. stefano.mazzuco@unipd.it.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-5477
Marc SuhrckeLuxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Maison des Sciences Humaines 11, 4366, Esch-sur-Alzette, Belval, Luxembourg.
Lucia ZanottoDepartment of Economics, University of Venice, Fondamenta San Giobbe 873, 30100, Venice, Italy.
Ca' Foscari University of Venice · ITLuxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research · LUUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of "premature mortality" is at the heart of many national and global health measurement and benchmarking efforts. However, despite the intuitive appeal of its underlying concept, it is far from obvious how to best operationalise it. The previous work offers at least two basic approaches: an absolute and a relative one. The former-and far more widely used- approach sets a unique age threshold (e.g. 65 years), below which deaths are defined as premature. The relative approach derives the share of premature deaths from the country-specific age distribution of deaths in the country of interest. The biggest disadvantage of the absolute approach is that of using a unique, arbitrary threshold for different mortality patterns, while the main disadvantage of the relative approach is that its estimate of premature mortality strongly depends on how the senescent deaths distribution is defined in each country.

methodWe propose to overcome some of the downsides of the existing approaches, by combining features of both, using a hierarchical model, in which senescent deaths distribution is held constant for each country as a pivotal quantity and the premature mortality distribution is allowed to vary across countries. In this way, premature mortality estimates become more comparable across countries with similar characteristics.

resultsThe proposed hierarchical models provide results, which appear to align with related evidence from  specific countries. In particular, we find a relatively high premature mortality for the United States and Denmark.

conclusionsWhile our hybrid approach overcomes some of the problems of previous measures, some issues require further research, in particular the choice of the group of countries that a given country is assigned to and the choice of the benchmarks within the groups. Hence, our proposed method, combined with further study addressing these issues, could provide a valid alternative way to measure and compare premature mortality across countries.

Indexed as

Global HealthMortality, PrematureAge DistributionHumansUnited StatesHierarchical modelMixture modelPremature mortality

Identifiers

PMID34702295
PMCPMC8547117
OpenAlexW3129400193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.