ArticlePopulation health metrics2021
How to measure premature mortality? A proposal combining "relative" and "absolute" approaches.
Article in Population health metrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Premature Mortality in Bangladesh During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of Absolute and Relative Measures.Public health challenges · 2026Article
- Prevalence and mortality of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome in US adults, 1999-2018.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Association of waist circumference and BMI with premature death in young and middle-aged population.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Trends in Avoidable Mortality in Kazakhstan From 2015 to 2021.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Global, regional and national burden, incidence, and mortality of cervical cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
- COVID-19: years of life lost (YLL) and saved (YLS) as an expression of the role of vaccination.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Correction to: How to measure premature mortality? A proposal combining "relative" and "absolute" approaches.Population health metrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of "premature mortality" is at the heart of many national and global health measurement and benchmarking efforts. However, despite the intuitive appeal of its underlying concept, it is far from obvious how to best operationalise it. The previous work offers at least two basic approaches: an absolute and a relative one. The former-and far more widely used- approach sets a unique age threshold (e.g. 65 years), below which deaths are defined as premature. The relative approach derives the share of premature deaths from the country-specific age distribution of deaths in the country of interest. The biggest disadvantage of the absolute approach is that of using a unique, arbitrary threshold for different mortality patterns, while the main disadvantage of the relative approach is that its estimate of premature mortality strongly depends on how the senescent deaths distribution is defined in each country.
methodWe propose to overcome some of the downsides of the existing approaches, by combining features of both, using a hierarchical model, in which senescent deaths distribution is held constant for each country as a pivotal quantity and the premature mortality distribution is allowed to vary across countries. In this way, premature mortality estimates become more comparable across countries with similar characteristics.
resultsThe proposed hierarchical models provide results, which appear to align with related evidence from specific countries. In particular, we find a relatively high premature mortality for the United States and Denmark.
conclusionsWhile our hybrid approach overcomes some of the problems of previous measures, some issues require further research, in particular the choice of the group of countries that a given country is assigned to and the choice of the benchmarks within the groups. Hence, our proposed method, combined with further study addressing these issues, could provide a valid alternative way to measure and compare premature mortality across countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.