Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702256›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2021

Knowledge translation following the implementation of a state-wide Paediatric Sepsis Pathway in the emergency department- a multi-centre survey study.

Amanda Harley, Luregn J Schlapbach, Paula Lister, Debbie Massey, Patricia Gilholm, Amy N B Johnston

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda HarleySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Amanda.Harley@health.qld.gov.au.
Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Paula ListerPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.
Debbie MasseySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
Patricia GilholmChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Amy N B JohnstonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUSouthern Cross University · AUSunshine Coast University Hospital · AUUniversity Children's Hospital Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral health care systems internationally have implemented protocolised sepsis recognition and treatment bundles for children to improve outcomes, as recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Successful implementation of clinical pathways is challenging and dependent on nurse engagement. There is limited data on knowledge translation during implementation of sepsis quality improvement programs.

methodsThis cross-sectional, multicentre observational survey study evaluated knowledge and perceptions of Emergency Department nurses in relation to the recognition, escalation and management of paediatric sepsis following implementation of a sepsis pathway. The study was conducted between September 2019 and March 2020 across 14 Emergency Departments in Queensland, Australia. The primary outcome was a sepsis knowledge score. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to identify factors impacting nurses' perceptions of recognition, escalation and management of paediatric sepsis and their association with knowledge. Using a logistic mixed effects model we explored associations between knowledge, identified factors and other clinical, demographic and hospital site variables.

resultsIn total, 676 nurses responded to the survey and 534 were included in the analysis. The median knowledge score was 57.1% (IQR = 46.7-66.7), with considerable variation observed between sites. The exploratory factor analysis identified five factors contributing to paediatric sepsis recognition, escalation and management, categorised as 1) knowledge and beliefs, 2) social influences, 3) beliefs about capability and skills delivering treatment, 4) beliefs about capability and behaviour and 5) environmental context. Nurses reported strong agreement with statements measuring four of the five factors, responding lowest to the factor pertaining to capability and skills delivering treatment for paediatric sepsis. The factors knowledge and beliefs, capability and skills, and environmental context were positively associated with a higher knowledge score. Years of paediatric experience and dedicated nurse funding for the sepsis quality improvement initiative were also associated with a higher knowledge score.

conclusionTranslation of evidence to practice such as successful implementation of a sepsis care bundle, relies on effective education of staff and sustained uptake of protocols in daily practice. Our survey findings identify key elements associated with enhanced knowledge including dedicated funding for hospitals to target paediatric sepsis quality improvement projects.

Indexed as

Patient Care BundlesSepsisChildCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansTranslational Research, BiomedicalClinical pathwayImplementationKnowledge translationManagementNurseRecognition; sepsis; sepsis pathway; septic shock

Identifiers

PMID34702256
PMCPMC8547904
OpenAlexW3136724335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.