Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702168›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Personalized multicomponent exercise programs using smartphone technology among older people: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Yael Netz, Esther Argov, Ziv Yekutieli, Moshe Ayalon, Keren Tchelet, David Ben-Sira, Yihya Amar, Jeremy M Jacobs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04181983 (Personalized Exercise Programs for Older Adults - a Digital User-friendly Application), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04181983 nacompletednot on this map

Personalized Exercise Programs for Older Adults - a Digital User-friendly Application

TypeinterventionalSponsorHadassah Medical OrganizationRan2019 to 2022Enrolled239ConditionsHealthy Older Adults, ExerciseArmsPersonalized exercise program, WHO exercise guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation: are we ready?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. A Literature Review of High-Tech Physiotherapy Interventions in the Elderly with Neurological Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Going digital - a commentary on the terminology used at the intersection of physical activity and digital health.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yael NetzThe Academic College at Wingate, 4209200, Netanya, Israel. neyael@wincol.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-6554-0102
Esther ArgovThe Academic College at Wingate, 4209200, Netanya, Israel.
Ziv YekutieliMontfort Brain Monitor LTD, Binyamina, Israel.
Moshe AyalonThe Academic College at Wingate, 4209200, Netanya, Israel.
Keren TcheletMontfort Brain Monitor LTD, Binyamina, Israel.
David Ben-SiraThe Academic College at Wingate, 4209200, Netanya, Israel.
Yihya AmarFaculty of Medicine, Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jeremy M JacobsFaculty of Medicine, Department of Geriatric Rehabilitation, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal application of the recently updated World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for exercise in advanced age necessitates an accurate adjustment for the age-related increasing variability in biological age and fitness levels, alongside detailed recommendations across a range of motor fitness components, including balance, strength, and flexibility. We previously developed and validated a novel tool, designed to both remotely assess these fitness components, and subsequently deliver a personalized exercise program via smartphone. We describe the design of a prospective randomized control trial, comparing the effectiveness of the remotely delivered personalized multicomponent exercise program to either WHO exercise guidelines or no intervention.

methodsParticipants (n = 300) are community dwelling, healthy, functionally independent, cognitively intact volunteers aged ≥65 at low risk for serious fall injuries, assigned using permuted block randomization (age/gender) to intervention, active-control, or control group. The intervention is an 8-week program including individually tailored exercises for upper/lower body, flexibility, strength, and balance (dynamic, static, vestibular); active-controls receive exercising counselling according to WHO guidelines; controls receive no guidance. Primary outcome is participant fitness level, operationalized as 42 digital markers generated from 10 motor fitness measures (balance, strength, flexibility); measured at baseline, mid-trial (4-weeks), trial-end (8-weeks), and follow-up (12-weeks). Target sample size is 300 participants to provide 99% power for moderate and high effect sizes (Cohen's f = 0.25, 0.40 respectively). DISCUSSION: The study will help understand the value of individualized motor fitness assessment used to generate personalized multicomponent exercise programs, delivered remotely among older adults.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04181983.

Indexed as

ExerciseSmartphoneAgedExercise TherapyHumansProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTechnologyArtificial intelligenceExercise prescriptionIndividualized programMotor fitnessRemote assessment

Identifiers

PMID34702168
PMCPMC8547559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.