Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34702077›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Animal lifestyle affects acceptable mass limits for attached tags.

Rory P Wilson, Kayleigh A Rose, Richard Gunner, Mark D Holton, Nikki J Marks, Nigel C Bennett, Stephen H Bell, Joshua P Twining, Jamie Hesketh, Carlos M Duarte and 11 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Guidelines for Telemetry Studies on Snow Leopards.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Rory P WilsonSwansea Laboratory for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3177-0107
Kayleigh A RoseSwansea Laboratory for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7023-2809
Richard GunnerSwansea Laboratory for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2054-9944
Mark D HoltonCollege of Science, Swansea University, Fabian Way, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK.
Nikki J MarksSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.
Nigel C BennettMammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-2947
Stephen H BellSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.
Joshua P TwiningSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0881-9665
Jamie HeskethSwansea Laboratory for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Carlos M DuarteRed Sea Research Centre, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia.
Neil BezodisApplied Sports, Technology, Exercise and Medicine (A-STEM) Research Centre, College of Engineering, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK.
Milos JezekDepartment of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague 165 00, Czech Republic.
Michael PainterDepartment of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague 165 00, Czech Republic.
Vaclav SilovskyDepartment of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague 165 00, Czech Republic.
Margaret C CrofootDepartment for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Bücklestraβe 5, Konstanz D-78467, Germany.
Roi HarelDepartment for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Bücklestraβe 5, Konstanz D-78467, Germany.
John P Y ArnouldSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VC 3125, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1124-9330
Blake M AllanSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VC 3125, Victoria, Australia.
Desley A WhissonSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VC 3125, Victoria, Australia.
Abdulaziz AlagailiKSU Mammals Research Chair, Zoology Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
D Michael ScantleburySchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5DL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0556
Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior · DEQueen's University Belfast · GBCzech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZDeakin University · AUSwansea University · GBKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology · SAKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal-attached devices have transformed our understanding of vertebrate ecology. To minimize any associated harm, researchers have long advocated that tag masses should not exceed 3% of carrier body mass. However, this ignores tag forces resulting from animal movement. Using data from collar-attached accelerometers on 10 diverse free-ranging terrestrial species from koalas to cheetahs, we detail a tag-based acceleration method to clarify acceptable tag mass limits. We quantify animal athleticism in terms of fractions of animal movement time devoted to different collar-recorded accelerations and convert those accelerations to forces (acceleration × tag mass) to allow derivation of any defined force limits for specified fractions of any animal's active time. Specifying that tags should exert forces that are less than 3% of the gravitational force exerted on the animal's body for 95% of the time led to corrected tag masses that should constitute between 1.6% and 2.98% of carrier mass, depending on athleticism. Strikingly, in four carnivore species encompassing two orders of magnitude in mass (

Indexed as

AccelerationCarnivoraAnimalsMovementcollar designdetrimentethicsguidelinestag mass

Identifiers

PMID34702077
PMCPMC8548787
OpenAlexW3209242114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.