Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34700344›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2022

Dose-finding study of ibrutinib and venetoclax in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

Craig A Portell, Nolan A Wages, Brad S Kahl, Lihua E Budde, Robert W Chen, Jonathon B Cohen, Nikole E Varhegyi, Gina R Petroni, Michael E Williams

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02419560 (Multi-institution Phase I/Ib Study of Ibrutinib With ABT-199 in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02419560 phase1completednot on this map

Multi-institution Phase I/Ib Study of Ibrutinib With ABT-199 in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorCraig Portell, MDRan2015 to 2021Enrolled37ConditionsLymphoma, Mantle-Cell, Recurrent Lymphoma, Mantle-CellArmsABT-199 and Ibrutinib Combination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Craig A PortellDivision of Hematology and Oncology.ORCID 0000-0002-9487-8345
Nolan A WagesCancer Center, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2190-4864
Brad S KahlOncology Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0003-0459-6609
Lihua E BuddeCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and.ORCID 0000-0003-1464-5494
Robert W ChenCity of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and.
Jonathon B CohenEmory University/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-2723-6481
Nikole E VarhegyiCancer Center, and.
Gina R PetroniCancer Center, and.
Michael E WilliamsDivision of Hematology and Oncology.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-9983

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Jay William FOX · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relapsed Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is often treated with Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi); however, post-BTKi relapse can be challenging. Adding venetoclax (VEN) to ibrutinib (IBR) has shown synergy in preclinical MCL models. Prior MCL studies of the combination show promising efficacy but have conducted limited dose finding. We sought to identify the optimal dosing combination, based on efficacy and toxicity, utilizing a continual reassessment method of 6 combinations of IBR (280 mg, 420 mg, and 560 mg by mouth daily) and VEN (max dose of 200 mg and 400 mg by mouth daily). Eligible participants were not previously exposed to BTKi and not high risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). VEN, initiated first at 100 mg, then at 20 mg by mouth daily after a TLS event, was started prior to adding IBR and ramped-up based on the dose level assigned. Combination treatment continued for six 28-day cycles. Thirty-five participants were enrolled and treated. One TLS event occurred with starting dose of 100 mg VEN; no TLS was seen with 20 mg. The optimal dosing combination was considered to be VEN 200 mg and IBR 420 mg with an overall response rate (ORR) of 93.8% (95% CI: 73.6% to 99.7%) and DLT incidence of 6.2% (95% CI: 0.3% to 26.4%). ORR for all arms was 82.3% (28/34; 95% CI: 65.5% to 93.2%) with a complete response (CR) rate of 42.4% (14/33; 95% CI: 25.5% to 60.8%). A participant was not allocated to IBR 560 mg and VEN 400 mg. ORR benefit was not seen with higher dosing combinations and toxicity was higher; a comparison made within the limitations of small cohorts. Resistance was seen in nearly all arms. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02419560.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Mantle-CellAdenineAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPiperidinesSulfonamidesAdenineBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicibrutinibPiperidinesSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID34700344
PMCPMC8905688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.