Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34700200›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of aging2022

Sex differences in cognitive aging: a 4-year longitudinal study in marmosets.

Emily S Rothwell, Kathryn P Workman, Dongwei Wang, Agnès Lacreuse

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scopolamine induced learning deficit in marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Parallel patterns of cognitive aging in marmosets and macaques.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily S RothwellDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA. Electronic address: erothwell@umass.edu.
Kathryn P WorkmanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Dongwei WangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Agnès LacreuseDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA; Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
University of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Sex differences in cognitive and brain aging: a primate modelR01AG046266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI LACREUSE, AGNES · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Behavioral and Neural Indicators of Prodromal Alzheimer's DiseaseF32AG064925 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI ROTHWELL, EMILY S. · 2019 to 2023
$190k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG064925NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal studies are essential to understand healthy and pathological neurocognitive aging such as Alzheimer's Disease, but longitudinal designs are rare in both humans and non-human primate models of aging because of the difficulty of tracking cognitive change in long-lived primates. Common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are uniquely suited for aging studies due to their naturally short lifespan (10-12 years), sophisticated cognitive and social abilities and Alzheimer Disease-like neuropathology. We report the first longitudinal study of cognitive aging in marmosets (N = 28) as they transitioned from middle- (∼5 years) to old age (∼9 years). We characterized aging trajectories using reversal learning with different stimuli each year. Marmosets initially improved on cognitive performance due to practice, but worsened in the final year, suggesting the onset of age-related decline. Cognitive impairment emerged earlier in females than males and was more prominent for discrimination than for reversal learning. Sex differences in cognitive aging could not be explained by differences in motivation or motor abilities, which improved or remained stable across aging. Likewise, males and females did not differ in aging trajectories of overall behavior or reactivity to a social stressor, with the exception of a progressive decline in the initiation of social behavior in females. Patterns of cognitive aging were highly variable across marmosets of both sexes, suggesting the potential for pathological aging for some individuals. Future work will link individual cognitive trajectories to neuropathology in order to better understand the relationships between neuropathologic burden and vulnerability to age-related cognitive decline in each sex.

Indexed as

CallithrixSex CharacteristicsAgingAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCognitionCognitive AgingFemaleLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, AnimalReversal LearningSocial BehaviorTime FactorsAgingCognitionMarmosetNonhuman primateReversal learningSex difference

Identifiers

PMID34700200
PMCPMC8841951
OpenAlexW3201307589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.