Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34700100›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Chestnut tannins in broiler diets: performance, nutrient digestibility, and meat quality.

Kobe Buyse, Evelyne Delezie, Luc Goethals, Noémie Van Noten, Richard Ducatelle, Geert P J Janssens, Marta Lourenço

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dietary supplementation withAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of dietary supplementation with microencapsulatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kobe BuyseAnimal Science Unit, Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food Research, Melle 9090, Belgium; Department of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium. Electronic address: Kobe.Buyse@ilvo.vlaanderen.be.
Evelyne DelezieAnimal Science Unit, Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food Research, Melle 9090, Belgium.
Luc GoethalsSanluc International NV, Gent 9000, Belgium.
Noémie Van NotenSanluc International NV, Gent 9000, Belgium.
Richard DucatelleLaboratory of Veterinary Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Geert P J JanssensDepartment of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke 9820, Belgium.
Marta LourençoAnimal Science Unit, Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food Research, Melle 9090, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2 broiler trials, the effects of chestnut tannins on performance and meat quality (trial 1), and digestion (trial 2) were evaluated. In both trials, Ross 308 broilers received one of 2 basal diets: one basal diet contained corn and soy as main feed ingredients, while the challenge basal diet contained wheat, palm oil, and rapeseed meal. The composition of the basal diets was chosen to assess the interaction between chestnut tannins and diet composition. To both basal diets, chestnut tannins were added at 3 doses: 0 mg/kg (T-), 500 mg/kg (T+), or 2,000 mg/kg (T++), resulting in a total of 6 treatments. In trial 1, both basal diets containing 2,000 mg/kg chestnut tannins lowered broiler performance in grower and finisher phases. A tannin dose of 500 mg/kg had no effect on performance in either basal diet. Corn-based diets resulted in lower meat pH compared to wheat diets. Further, addition of chestnut tannins resulted in increased meat pH, and caused proportionally a lower meat drip loss and shear force for both basal diets. During the digestibility study (trial 2), blood was also collected. None of the treatments affected digestibility or blood parameters (glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, and triacylglycerols). Malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured in plasma to assess antioxidative properties of chestnut tannins. In wheat diets, chestnut tannins significantly lowered plasma MDA demonstrating its antioxidative nature. Regarding gut health, crypt depth decreased proportionally with the dosage of chestnut tannins in both basal diets with significantly shallower crypts for the wheat diets compared to the corn diets. Relative intestinal growth was stimulated in the wheat diets proportionally to the tannin dose based on the larger relative gut length. In conclusion, chestnut tannins did not influence digestive metabolism, yet they lowered performance at higher doses regardless of feed ingredients used in the diet. Tannins positively affected meat quality and when added to wheat diets, intestinal growth was stimulated and the antioxidative status of the broilers improved.

Indexed as

ChickensTanninsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDigestionMeatNutrientsNutrientsTanninsbroilerchestnut wood tannindigestionmeat qualityperformance

Identifiers

PMID34700100
PMCPMC8554258
OpenAlexW3199083015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.