ArticleAdvanced healthcare materials2022
Computational Modeling and Experimental Characterization of Extrusion Printing into Suspension Baths.
Article in Advanced healthcare materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational approaches in bioprinting processes.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026Article
- Tuning collagen and collagen-alginate mechanics through extrusion bioprinting process parameters.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Clickable PEG-norbornene microgels support suspension bioprinting and microvascular assembly.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Biofabrication in suspension media-a decade of advances.Biofabrication · 2025Review
- Mechanically robust non-swelling cold water fish gelatin hydrogels for 3D bioprinting.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Engineered Shape-Morphing Transitions in Hydrogels Through Suspension Bath Printing of Temperature-Responsive Granular Hydrogel Inks.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Article
- Gel-Based Suspension Medium Used in 3D Bioprinting for Constructing Tissue/Organ Analogs.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Embedded 3D Bioprinting of Collagen Inks into Microgel Baths to Control Hydrogel Microstructure and Cell Spreading.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Aspects of a Suspended Bioprinting System Affect Cell Viability and Support Bath Properties.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2024Article
- Dissecting the Interplay Mechanism among Process Parameters toward the Biofabrication of High-Quality Shapes in Embedded Bioprinting.Advanced functional materials · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- 3D printed scaffolds based on hyaluronic acid bioinks for tissue engineering: a review.Biomaterials research · 2023Review
- Engineering Nano/Microscale Chiral Self-Assembly in 3D Printed Constructs.Nano-micro letters · 2023Article
- A dive into the bath: embedded 3D bioprinting of freeformBiomaterials science · 2023Review
- Engineered biomaterials to guide spheroid formation, function, and fabrication into 3D tissue constructs.Acta biomaterialia · 2023Review
- Self-Healing Injectable Hydrogels for Tissue Regeneration.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The extrusion printing of inks into suspension baths is an exciting tool, as it allows the printing of diverse and soft hydrogel inks into 3D space without the need for layer-by-layer fabrication. However, this printing process is complex and there have been limited studies to experimentally and computationally characterize the process. In this work, hydrogel inks (i.e., gelatin methacrylamide (GelMA)), suspension baths (i.e., agarose, Carbopol), and the printing process are examined via rheological, computational, and experimental analyses. Rheological data on various hydrogel inks and suspension baths is utilized to develop computational printing simulations based on Carreau constitutive viscosity models of the printing of inks within suspension baths. These results are then compared to experimental outcomes using custom print designs where features such as needle translation speed, defined in this work as print speed, are varied and printed filament resolution is quantified. Results are then used to identify print parameters for the printing of a GelMA ink into a unique guest-host hyaluronic acid suspension bath. This work emphasizes the importance of key rheological properties and print parameters for suspension bath printing and provides a computational model and experimental tools that can be used to inform the selection of print settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.