ArticleExperimental dermatology2022
Future applications of 3D bioprinting: A promising technology for treating recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Article in Experimental dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Innovations in topical epidermolysis bullosa treatment: integrating advanced dressings, bioactive therapies and tissue-engineered skin.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Innovate to heal: 3D bioprinting tackles epidermolysis bullosa.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Pioneering the Future of Oral Healthcare: Bioprinting and Its Transformative Clinical Potential in Dentistry.Cureus · 2025Review
- Commercial articulated collaborativeInternational journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- A review on cell damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting.Military Medical Research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a rapidly developing technology that has the potential to initiate a paradigm shift in the treatment of skin wounds arising from burns, ulcers and genodermatoses. Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), a severe form of epidermolysis bullosa, is a rare genodermatosis that results in mechanically induced blistering of epithelial tissues that leads to chronic wounds. Currently, there is no cure for RDEB, and effective treatment is limited to protection from trauma and extensive bandaging. The care of chronic wounds and burns significantly burdens the healthcare system, further illustrating the dire need for more beneficial wound care. However, in its infancy, 3D bioprinting offers therapeutic potential for wound healing and could be a breakthrough technology for the treatment of rare, incurable genodermatoses like RDEB. This viewpoint essay outlines the promise of 3D bioprinting applications for treating RDEB, including skin regeneration, a delivery system for gene-edited cells and small molecules, and disease modelling. Although the future of 3D bioprinting is encouraging, there are many technical challenges to overcome-including optimizing bioink and cell source-before this approach can be widely implemented in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.