Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34699528›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2021

The estimated health impact of sodium reduction through food reformulation in Australia: A modeling study.

Kathy Trieu, Daisy H Coyle, Ashkan Afshin, Bruce Neal, Matti Marklund, Jason H Y Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Salty and Savoury Snacks Compliance with 2016 and 2019 Sodium Content Targets-Durban Market, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathy TrieuThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1848-2741
Daisy H CoyleThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-0671
Ashkan AfshinUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0490-7465
Matti MarklundThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3320-796X
Jason H Y WuThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2073-3562
UNSW Sydney · AUJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Australian Government recently established sodium targets for packaged foods to encourage voluntary reformulation to reduce population sodium consumption and related diseases. We modeled the health impact of Australia's sodium reformulation targets and additional likely health gains if more ambitious, yet feasible sodium targets had been adopted instead. METHODS AND

findingsUsing comparative risk assessment models, we estimated the averted deaths, incidence, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from cardiovascular disease (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and stomach cancer after implementation of (a) Australia's sodium targets (overall and by individual companies); (b) United Kingdom's targets (that covers more product categories); and (c) an optimistic scenario (sales-weighted 25th percentile sodium content for each food category included in the UK program). We used nationally representative data to estimate pre- and post-intervention sodium intake, and other key data sources from the Global Burden of Disease study. Full compliance with the Australian government's sodium targets could prevent approximately 510 deaths/year (95% UI, 335 to 757), corresponding to about 1% of CVD, CKD, and stomach cancer deaths, and prevent some 1,920 (1,274 to 2,600) new cases and 7,240 (5,138 to 10,008) DALYs/year attributable to these diseases. Over half (59%) of deaths prevented is attributed to reformulation by 5 market-dominant companies. Compliance with the UK and optimistic scenario could avert approximately an additional 660 (207 to 1,227) and 1,070 (511 to 1,856) deaths/year, respectively, compared to Australia's targets. The main limitation of this study (like other modeling studies) is that it does not prove that sodium reformulation programs will prevent deaths and disease events; rather, it provides the best quantitative estimates and the corresponding uncertainty of the potential effect of the different programs to guide the design of policies.

conclusionsThere is significant potential to strengthen Australia's sodium reformulation targets to improve its health impact. Promoting compliance by market-dominant food companies will be critical to achieving the potential health gains.

Indexed as

Food, FormulatedModels, TheoreticalAustraliaCardiovascular DiseasesDisability-Adjusted Life YearsFeeding BehaviorHumansIncidenceRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentSodium, DietaryStomach NeoplasmsSodium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID34699528
PMCPMC8547659
OpenAlexW3208707366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.