ArticlePloS one2021
A bioinformatics pipeline for Mycobacterium tuberculosis sequencing that cleans contaminant reads from sputum samples.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Targeted next-generation sequencing to diagnose drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Whole genome sequence of petroleum hydrocarbon degrading novel strain Microbacter sp. EMBS2025 isolated from Chilika Lake, Odisha, India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Pangenome databases improve host removal and mycobacteria classification from clinical metagenomic data.GigaScience · 2024Article
- The MAGMA pipeline for comprehensive genomic analyses of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis samples.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The Role of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) in the Management of Tuberculosis: Practical Review for Implementation in Routine.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Rapid Identification of Drug Resistance and Phylogeny in M. tuberculosis, Directly from Sputum Samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is widely used to investigate genomic variation. In several studies, the genetic variation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has been analyzed in sputum samples without previous culture, using target enrichment methodologies for NGS. Alignments obtained by different programs generally map the sequences under default parameters, and from these results, it is assumed that only Mycobacterium reads will be obtained. However, variants of interest microorganism in clinical samples can be confused with a vast collection of reads from other bacteria, viruses, and human DNA. Currently, there are no standardized pipelines, and the cleaning success is never verified since there is a lack of rigorous controls to identify and remove reads from other sputum-microorganisms genetically similar to M. tuberculosis. Therefore, we designed a bioinformatic pipeline to process NGS data from sputum samples, including several filters and quality control points to identify and eliminate non-M. tuberculosis reads to obtain a reliable genetic variant report. Our proposal uses the SURPI software as a taxonomic classifier to filter input sequences and perform a mapping that provides the highest percentage of Mycobacterium reads, minimizing the reads from other microorganisms. We then use the filtered sequences to perform variant calling with the GATK software, ensuring the mapping quality, realignment, recalibration, hard-filtering, and post-filter to increase the reliability of the reported variants. Using default mapping parameters, we identified reads of contaminant bacteria, such as Streptococcus, Rhotia, Actinomyces, and Veillonella. Our final mapping strategy allowed a sequence identity of 97.8% between the input reads and the whole M. tuberculosis reference genome H37Rv using a genomic edit distance of three, thus removing 98.8% of the off-target sequences with a Mycobacterium reads loss of 1.7%. Finally, more than 200 unreliable genetic variants were removed during the variant calling, increasing the report's reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.