Trial reportBlood pressure monitoring2022
Effects of vibegron on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with overactive bladder: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Blood pressure monitoring, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 Randomized Controlled COURAGE Trial.The Journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Navigating the challenges of overactive bladder management in women.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Real-world persistence of vibegron in patients aged ≥ 80 years with overactive bladder: a multicenter cohort study.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Therapeutic Potential of the β3-Adrenergic Receptor and Its Ligands in Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Vibegron in overactive bladder: a comprehensive review of efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Vibegron for overactive bladder in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia/obstruction: insights from the COURAGE trial.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Study design of a phase 4, real-world study (COMPOSUR) to evaluate vibegron in patients with overactive bladder.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Vibegron shows high selectivity and potent agonist activity for β3-adrenoceptors, irrespective of receptor density.PloS one · 2023Article
- An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2022Review
- Long-term efficacy and safety of vibegron versus mirabegron and anticholinergics for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Drugs in context · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo characterize the blood pressure (BP) profile of the new β3-adrenergic receptor agonist, vibegron, in patients with overactive bladder.
methodsPatients were randomized to once-daily vibegron 75 mg or placebo for 28 days and underwent ambulatory BP monitoring. The primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in mean daytime ambulatory systolic BP (SBP). Secondary endpoints were CFB in mean 24-h SBP and in mean daytime and mean 24-h ambulatory diastolic BP (DBP) and heart rate (HR). Safety was assessed through adverse event reporting.
resultsOf 214 patients randomized, 96 receiving vibegron and 101 receiving placebo had evaluable baseline and day 28 measurements. Overall, 39.6 and 30.7% of patients receiving vibegron and placebo, respectively, had preexisting hypertension. The least squares mean difference (LSMD; 90% confidence interval) between vibegron and placebo in CFB in mean daytime SBP was 0.8 (-0.9, 2.5) mmHg. LSMD in CFB in mean daytime DBP and HR was 0.0 mmHg and 0.9 bpm, respectively. No significant differences between treatments were seen in CFB in mean 24-h SBP (LSMD, 0.6 mmHg), DBP (-0.2 mmHg) or HR (1.0 bpm). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was hypertension, with rates comparable between groups [vibegron: n = 5 (4.7%); placebo: n = 4 (3.7%)]. One patient receiving vibegron took a prohibited medication (phentermine) known to increase BP.
conclusionsOnce-daily vibegron had no statistically significant or clinically relevant effects on BP or HR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.