ArticleIEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems2022
Cellular Automata Can Reduce Memory Requirements of Collective-State Computing.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptron Theory Can Predict the Accuracy of Neural Networks.IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems · 2024Article
- Cellular automata imbedded memristor-based recirculated logic in-memory computing.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Vector Symbolic Architectures as a Computing Framework for Emerging Hardware.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2022Article
- Efficient emotion recognition using hyperdimensional computing with combinatorial channel encoding and cellular automata.Brain informatics · 2022Article
- On separating long- and short-term memories in hyperdimensional computing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various nonclassical approaches of distributed information processing, such as neural networks, reservoir computing (RC), vector symbolic architectures (VSAs), and others, employ the principle of collective-state computing. In this type of computing, the variables relevant in computation are superimposed into a single high-dimensional state vector, the collective state. The variable encoding uses a fixed set of random patterns, which has to be stored and kept available during the computation. In this article, we show that an elementary cellular automaton with rule 90 (CA90) enables the space-time tradeoff for collective-state computing models that use random dense binary representations, i.e., memory requirements can be traded off with computation running CA90. We investigate the randomization behavior of CA90, in particular, the relation between the length of the randomization period and the size of the grid, and how CA90 preserves similarity in the presence of the initialization noise. Based on these analyses, we discuss how to optimize a collective-state computing model, in which CA90 expands representations on the fly from short seed patterns-rather than storing the full set of random patterns. The CA90 expansion is applied and tested in concrete scenarios using RC and VSAs. Our experimental results show that collective-state computing with CA90 expansion performs similarly compared to traditional collective-state models, in which random patterns are generated initially by a pseudorandom number generator and then stored in a large memory.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.