Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34699346›Full record

ArticleMicrobial genomics2021

The Dynamic Codon Biaser: calculating prokaryotic codon usage biases.

Brian Dehlinger, Jared Jurss, Karson Lychuk, Catherine Putonti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian DehlingerBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Jared JurssBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Karson LychukBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.
Catherine PutontiBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial genomes often reflect a bias in the usage of codons. These biases are often most notable within highly expressed genes. While deviations in codon usage can be attributed to selection or mutational biases, they can also be functional, for example controlling gene expression or guiding protein structure. Several different metrics have been developed to identify biases in codon usage. Previously we released a database, CBDB: The Codon Bias Database, in which users could retrieve precalculated codon bias data for bacterial RefSeq genomes. With the increase of bacterial genome sequence data since its release a new tool was needed. Here we present the Dynamic Codon Biaser (DCB) tool, a web application that dynamically calculates the codon usage bias statistics of prokaryotic genomes. DCB bases these calculations on 40 different highly expressed genes (HEGs) that are highly conserved across different prokaryotic species. A user can either specify an NCBI accession number or upload their own sequence. DCB returns both the bias statistics and the genome's HEG sequences. These calculations have several downstream applications, such as evolutionary studies and phage-host predictions. The source code is freely available, and the website is hosted at www.cbdb.info.

Indexed as

CodonCodon UsageGenome, BacterialProkaryotic CellsBacteriophagesBase CompositionGene ExpressionLactobacillusMutationCodoncodon biascodon usageDynamic Codon Biaserprokaryotes

Identifiers

PMID34699346
PMCPMC8627211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.