Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34698559›Full record

ArticlePopulation health management2022

Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Universal Screening of Social Determinants of Health: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Sophia Kostelanetz, Mariah Pettapiece-Phillips, Jacy Weems, Tamarra Spalding, Christianne Roumie, Consuelo H Wilkins, Sunil Kripalani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population health management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can Social Work Interventions Improve Perinatal Mental Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Safeguarding Social Determinants of Health Data at a Managed Health Plan.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophia KostelanetzDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Mariah Pettapiece-PhillipsCenter for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jacy WeemsCenter for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Tamarra SpaldingCenter for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Christianne RoumieDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Consuelo H WilkinsDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Sunil KripalaniDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Funding

Learning Health System training program: PROgRESS--Patient/ pRactice Outcomes and Research in Effectiveness and Systems ScienceT32HS026122 · AHRQ · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI GRIJALVA, CARLOS G, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS026122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDH) contribute to nearly 50% of health outcomes; however, SDH data collection is inconsistent in clinical practice. This study used mixed methods to evaluate health care professionals' perceptions of universal SDH screening at an academic medical center by surveying physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, social workers, case managers, pharmacists, and administrators. An electronic survey assessed SDH screening practices, prioritization of SDH domains, disciplines to perform screening, and attitudes and barriers to universal screening. Likert-scale responses were dichotomized and compared disciplines with proportions tests. Qualitative interviews identified themes and elaborated survey findings. Participant discipline was the primary predictor variable. Of 193 survey participants (62.5% response rate), most were physicians (31%) or social workers (22%). Participants overwhelmingly reported using SDH information in patient care (93%), and social workers as the most appropriate role for screening (95%). Most respondents (75%) believed health literacy is important, but 40% reported routine assessment. Housing status (73% vs. 53%) and financial strain (62% vs. 48%) followed similar patterns. SDH screening barriers included lacking resources to address identified needs (51%), time to ask (45%), support staff to ask (33%), and training in responding to identified needs (28%). Social workers cited barriers less often than non-social workers (

Indexed as

Health PersonnelSocial Determinants of HealthAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansMass ScreeningSurveys and Questionnairesclinical screeninghealth care professional perspectivessocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34698559
PMCPMC11913136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.