ReviewJournal of Intelligence2021
Are People-Centered Intelligences Psychometrically Distinct from Thing-Centered Intelligences? A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring emotional intelligence with the MSCEIT 2: theory, rationale, and initial findings.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Ability emotional intelligence profiles and real-life outcomes: a latent profile analysis of a large adult sample.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Major Choices: Students' Personal Intelligence, Considerations When Choosing a Major, and Academic Success.Journal of Intelligence · 2024Article
- The Social Shapes Test as a Self-Administered, Online Measure of Social Intelligence: Two Studies with Typically Developing Adults and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024Article
- Seeing emotions in the eyes: a validated test to study individual differences in the perception of basic emotions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2023Article
- Sentiment Analysis on Twitter: Role of Healthcare Professionals in the Global Conversation during the AstraZeneca Vaccine Suspension.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- EmBody/EmFace as a new open tool to assess emotion recognition from body and face expressions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Personal Intelligence Is Evident in the Sophistication of People's Narratives about Personality.Journal of Intelligence · 2022Article
- Using game-like animations of geometric shapes to simulate social interactions: An evaluation of group score differences.International journal of selection and assessment · 2022Article
- Understanding the Emotional Intelligence Discourse on Social Media: Insights from the Analysis of Twitter.Journal of Intelligence · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) or three-stratum model of intelligence envisions human intelligence as a hierarchy. General intelligence (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.