Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34698219›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2021

Improving Detection of Client Complexity in the Community (Impact): A Study Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jennifer Boak, Irene Blackberry, Tshepo Rasekaba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer BoakCommunity Nursing Services, Bendigo Health, Kennington, VIC 3550, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4554-0310
Irene BlackberryJohn Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4482-4936
Tshepo RasekabaJohn Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, La Trobe University, Wodonga, VIC 3689, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8714-0409
La Trobe University · AUBendigo Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-dwelling older clients are becoming increasingly complex. Detecting this complexity in clinical practice is limited, with greater reliance on community nurses' clinical judgment and skills. The lack of a consistent approach to complexity impacts the level of care and support for older clients to remain in their homes for longer.

objectiveTo examine the effectiveness of the Patient Complexity Instrument (PCI) in addition to nurses' clinical judgment to enhance detection of complexity, and subsequent older clients' resource allocation compared to usual nursing assessment.

designA pragmatic randomized controlled trial will be conducted within a community nursing service in regional Victoria, Australia. Clients 65 years and over referred to the service who are eligible for Commonwealth Home Support Programme (CHSP) funding will be randomized into Control group: usual nursing assessment or Intervention group: usual nursing assessment plus the PCI. Nurse participants are Registered Nurses currently employed in the community nursing service.

resultsThis study will explore whether introducing the PCI in a community nursing service enhances detection of complexity and client care resource allocation compared to nurses' clinical judgment based on usual nursing assessment.

conclusionThis protocol outlines the study to enhance the detection of complexity by nurses delivering care for community-dwelling older people in the regional Australian context. The findings will inform the use of a standardized tool to detect complexity among community-dwelling older Australians.

Indexed as

agedassessmenthealth care needshome nursing

Identifiers

PMID34698219
PMCPMC8544575
OpenAlexW3204363122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.