Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34698050›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2021

Scalable Newborn Screening Solutions: Bioinformatics and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Nicole Ruiz-Schultz, Bryce Asay, Andreas Rohrwasser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Editor's Choice for Issue 4, Volume 7.International journal of neonatal screening · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole Ruiz-SchultzUtah Public Health Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT 84129, USA.
Bryce AsayUtah Public Health Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT 84129, USA.
Andreas RohrwasserUtah Public Health Laboratory, Salt Lake City, UT 84129, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expansion of the newborn disorder panel requires the incorporation of new testing modalities. This is especially true for disorders lacking robust biomarkers for detection in primary screening methods and for disorders requiring genotyping or sequencing as a second-tier and/or diagnostic test. In this commentary, we discuss how next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods can be used as a secondary testing method in NBS. Additionally, we elaborate on the importance of genomic variant repositories for the annotation and interpretation of variants. Barriers to the incorporation of NGS and bioinformatics within NBS are discussed, and ideas for a regional bioinformatics model and shared variant repository are presented as potential solutions.

Indexed as

bioinformaticsgenomic variantsnewborn screeningnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34698050
PMCPMC8544371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.