Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697899›Full record

Observational studyPharmacology research & perspectives2021

Dynamics of the QTc interval over a 24-h dose interval after start of intravenous ciprofloxacin or low-dose erythromycin administration in ICU patients.

Florine A Berger, Willem van Weteringen, Heleen van der Sijs, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Jeroen J H Bunge, Natasja M S de Groot, Patricia M L A van den Bemt, Teun van Gelder

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Florine A BergerDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2723-8919
Willem van WeteringenDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-3169
Heleen van der SijsDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1744-0999
Nicole G M HunfeldDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-7028
Jeroen J H BungeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-4628
Natasja M S de GrootDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0259-6691
Patricia M L A van den BemtDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1418-5520
Teun van GelderDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5980-6947
Erasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

QTc interval prolongation is an adverse effect associated with the use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides. Ciprofloxacin and erythromycin are both frequently prescribed QTc-prolonging drugs in critically ill patients. Critically ill patients may be more vulnerable to developing QTc prolongation, as several risk factors can be present at the same time. Therefore, it is important to know the QTc-prolonging potential of these drugs in the intensive care unit (ICU) population. The aim of this study was to assess the dynamics of the QTc interval over a 24-hour dose interval during intravenous ciprofloxacin and low-dose erythromycin treatment. Therefore, an observational study was performed in ICU patients (≥18 years) receiving ciprofloxacin 400 mg t.i.d. or erythromycin 100 mg b.i.d. intravenously. Continuous ECG data were collected from 2 h before to 24 h after the first administration. QT-analyses were performed using high-end holter software. The effect was determined with a two-sample t-test for clustered data on all QTc values. A linear mixed model by maximum likelihood was applied, for which QTc values were assessed for the available time intervals and therapy. No evident effect over time on therapy with ciprofloxacin and erythromycin was observed on QTc time. There was no significant difference (p = 0.22) in QTc values between the ciprofloxacin group (mean 393 ms) and ciprofloxacin control group (mean 386 ms). The erythromycin group (mean 405 ms) and erythromycin control group (mean 404 ms) neither showed a significant difference (p = 0.80). In 0.6% of the registrations (1.138 out of 198.270 samples) the duration of the QTc interval was longer than 500 ms. The index groups showed slightly more recorded QTc intervals over 500 ms. To conclude, this study could not identify differences in the QTc interval between the treatments analyzed.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinCritical IllnessElectrocardiographyErythromycinFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsLong QT SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinErythromycinarrhythmiaciprofloxacindrug interactionserythromycinICUQTc prolongation

Identifiers

PMID34697899
PMCPMC8546217
OpenAlexW3210097331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.