Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697775›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2023

Promotion of Egg Production Rate and Quality Using Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801, a Potential Probiotic Screened from Feces of Laying Hens with Higher Egg Productive Performance.

Zhiqiang Wan, Ning Sun, Min Luo, Baoxing Gan, Zhipeng Yao, Xi Cao, Hesong Wang, Kangcheng Pan, Gang Shu, Yan Zeng and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Dietary Supplementation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiqiang Wan *Animal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Ning Sun *Animal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Min Luo *Animal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Baoxing GanAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Zhipeng YaoAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xi CaoAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Hesong WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kangcheng PanAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Gang ShuAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yan ZengAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Dong ZengAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. zend@sicau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-545X
Xueqin NiAnimal Microecology Institute, College of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China. xueqinni@foxmail.com.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this experiment, laying hens were divided into a high productive group (group H) and a low productive group (group L). The purpose of this experiment was to screen and isolate a potential probiotic associated with the laying rate from group H by comparing the results via 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. The high-throughput sequencing analysis results showed that there were some differences in the composition of the gut microbiome between groups H and L on the Phylum and Genus levels. Through isolation and identification, we screened 16 lactobacilli strains. Among the 16 strains, S5 showed good acid tolerance, bile salt tolerance, and cholesterol degradation. Therefore, we chose strain S5 (identified as Limosilactobacillus oris, named Limosilactobacillus oris BSLO 1801) as a potential probiotic to promote the productivity of ordinary laying hens. During the animal experiment, 288 Hy-line white hens (30 weeks old) were divided into four groups, with six replications (n = 12) per group. The control group received the basic diet, and the treatment groups received the same basic diet supplemented with 10

Indexed as

ChickensProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsCholesterolDietDietary SupplementsFecesFemaleCholesterolGut microbiomeHigh-throughput sequencingLaying hensProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID34697775
OpenAlexW3209454191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.