Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697719›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2022

Pandemic Risk and Standpoint Epistemology: A Matter of Solidarity.

Katrien Schaubroeck, Kristien Hens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katrien SchaubroeckPhilosophy Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. Katrien.Schaubroeck@uantwerpen.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6452-0652
Kristien HensPhilosophy Department, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-7918

Funding

European Research Council grant agreement No 804881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current and past pandemics have several aspects in common. It is expected that all members of society contribute to beat it. But it is also clear that the risks associated with the pandemic are different for different groups. This makes that appeals to solidarity based on technocratic risk calculations are only partially successful. Objective 'risks of transmission' may, for example, be trumped by risks of letting down people in need of help or by missing out certain opportunities in life. In this paper we argue that a rapprochement of the insights of standpoint epistemology with pandemic science and pandemic policy making may be an important step toward making pandemic science more accurate and pandemic calls for solidarity more effective.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansKnowledgeSARS-CoV-2Inclusive democracyInclusive sciencePandemicRiskStandpoint epistemology

Identifiers

PMID34697719
PMCPMC8544913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.