ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022
A bibliometric review of vegetation response to climate change.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Metabolomics biomarkers and related pathways in acute renal injury: a bibliometric investigation, meta-analysis, and systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of social isolation and loneliness on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and bibliometric investigation.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- Integrating the Perspectives of Youth, Women, and Marginalised Communities in Addressing Global Environmental Management Challenges.Environmental management · 2025Article
- Observational
- Global Research Trends and Hotspots in Fracture Nonunion and Delayed Union: A 2-Decade Bibliometric Analysis.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of Wolbachia research (1936-2024): Global landscape, mapping progress and themes.Parasite epidemiology and control · 2025Review
- Leaf adaptation strategy of non-tree plants altered by community structure implies vegetation degradation risk in alpine rocky desertification areas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Editorial: One Health approaches and modeling in parasitology in the climate change framework and possible supporting tools adopting GIS and remote sensing.Frontiers in parasitology · 2025Article
- Geospatial Mapping and Meteorological Flood Risk Assessment: A Global Research Trend Analysis.Environmental management · 2025Article
- Nano-enhanced immunity: A bibliometric analysis of nanoparticles in vaccine adjuvant research.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing the Variation of Plants' Cardinal Temperature: A Case Study in Iran.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Coffee arabica research (1932-2023): Performance, thematic evolution and mapping, global landscape, and emerging trends.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Cancer research in the United Arab Emirates from birth to present: A bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- "Long walk to 2030": A bibliometric and systematic review of research trends on the UN sustainable development goal 3.Dialogues in health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global assessment of vegetation response to climate change (VRCC) studies was conducted to reveal the research evolution, current research hotspots and better understanding of dominant themes in VRCC areas of research from 1992 to 2019 through the use of bibliometrics. A total of 186 articles with the search term "Vegetation response to Climate change" were retrieved using the Web of Science (WOS) database. The annual growth rate of 10.3% connotes that research on VRCC has been increasing over time during the survey period. Average citations per article experienced many fluctuations over the years rather than maintaining the same growth rate, which connotes that this field of research reached was unstable in terms of average total citation per document. Results show that China ranked first followed by the USA and the UK, and this shows the dominance of these countries on VRCC studies over the years in review. Results from corresponding authors' nationalities show that multiple-country publications are relatively low compared to articles from single-country publications which showed a dominant trend. Hence, we can infer that most studies on VRCC were sustained by single-country publications. Results from this study revealed top-cited articles, the top global distribution of documents, academic collaboration, most relevant keywords and Word TreeMap of high-frequency keywords. The findings of this study show that "temperature" is in a central position in all keywords with the largest significant appearance in the field. In conclusion, the findings from this study may be applicable for planning and managing vegetation and forest ecosystem research and provide hints for future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34697705What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.