Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697679›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Forecasting outcomes after cholecystectomy in octogenarian patients.

Fabrizio D'Acapito, Alessandro Cucchetti, Daniela Di Pietrantonio, Francesca Tauceri, Maria Teresa Mirarchi, Massimo Framarini, Raffaele Bova, Francesca Fappiano, Giorgio Ercolani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabrizio D'AcapitoGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy. fabrizioda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6420-6209
Alessandro CucchettiGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Daniela Di PietrantonioGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Francesca TauceriGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Maria Teresa MirarchiGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Massimo FramariniGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Raffaele BovaGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Francesca FappianoGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Giorgio ErcolaniGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Ospedale G.B. Morgagni - L.Pierantoni · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough gallstone disease increases with aging, elderly patients are less likely to undergo cholecystectomy. This is because age itself is a negative predictor after cholecystectomy. The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator can therefore help surgeons decide whether to operate or not. However, little is known about the accuracy of this model outside the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the ability of the ACS-NSQIP model to predict the clinical outcomes of patients aged 80 years or older undergoing elective or emergency cholecystectomy. STUDY

designThe study focused on 263 patients over 80 years of age operated on between 2010 and 2019: 174 were treated as emergencies because of acute cholecystitis (66.2%). Outcomes evaluated are those predicted by the ACS-NSQIP calculator within 30 days of surgery. The ACS-NSQIP model was tested for both discrimination and calibration. Differences among observed and expected outcomes were evaluated.

resultsWhen considering all patients, the discrimination of mortality was very high, as it was that of severe complications. Considering only the elective cholecystectomies, the discrimination capacity of ACS-NSQIP risk calculator has consistently worsened in each outcome while it remains high considering the emergency cholecystectomies. In the evaluation of the emergency cholecystectomy, the model showed a very high discriminatory ability and, more importantly, it showed an excellent calibration. Comparisons between main outcomes showed small or even negligible differences between observed and expected values.

conclusionThe results of the present study suggest that clinical decisions on cholecystectomy in a patient aged 80 years or older should be assisted through the ACS-NSQIP model.

Indexed as

OctogenariansPostoperative ComplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomyForecastingHumansQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentACS-NSQIPAcute cholecystitisCholecystectomyElderlyGallstonesGeriatric

Identifiers

PMID34697679
OpenAlexW3208565573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.