Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34697655›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Litigation after primary total hip and knee arthroplasties in France: review of legal actions over the past 30 years.

Grégoire Rougereau, Thibaut Marty-Diloy, Tristan Langlais, Nicolas Pujol, Philippe Boisrenoult

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grégoire RougereauDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. greg.rougereau@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1343-0881
Thibaut Marty-DiloyDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Center, 2 Rue de la Milétrie, 86021, Poitiers, France.
Tristan LanglaisDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Hôpital des enfants, Purpan, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas PujolDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, André Mignot Hospital, University Île-de-France Ouest, 177 Rue de Versailles, 78150, Le Chesnay, France.
Philippe BoisrenoultDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, André Mignot Hospital, University Île-de-France Ouest, 177 Rue de Versailles, 78150, Le Chesnay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the law of March 4, 2002, several modifications have impacted medical practices and their medico-legal implications. In case of an infectious complication not related to a fault of the practitioners (surgeons, anesthetists), the patient has the right to compensation assumed by the care structures. Moreover, the lack of preoperative information is no longer just a failing of the ethical standards but a breach of medical and legal obligations. Then, aims of this study were: (1) to describe the reasons for a lawsuit in France following total primary hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasties and (2) to compare litigation characteristics of private and public practices. MATERIALS AND

methodsCivil (private practice) and administrative (public practice) court decisions in France between 1990 and 2020 were collected using the two main legal data sources (Legifrance, Doctrine).

resultsEighty-three TKA and 173 THA cases were identified. Reasons for complaint in primary THA were mainly infection (29%), prosthetic failures (18%), nerves injuries (17%), and leg length discrepancies (11%). The main grounds for complaint in favor of the plaintiff were diagnostic or indication mistakes (100%), infections (80%), especially if a lack of information was recognized (88%). Reasons for complaint following primary TKA were mainly infections (65%) and persistent pain or stiffness (12%). Whatever the reason, the verdict was in favor of the plaintiff in about 2/3 of the cases. THAs were more at risk of appeal in administrative procedures than in civil (p = 0.008). There were more cases of implant failure in civil proceedings (p = 0.008). Indemnities after primary THA was higher in public activity litigation (p = 0.04). There were no differences in verdicts, grounds for complaints, and compensation between public and private practices for primary TKA.

conclusionThe main complaint about all the arthroplasties in France was a septic complication. The lack of information could be an added pejorative element for the final verdict.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeMalpracticeDatabases, FactualHumansKnee JointLeg Length InequalityFranceIndemnityLitigationMalpracticeTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.